pgsql-hackers before 2002-04-25 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

April 20, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: general design question Tom Lane 05:27
Re: general design question Martijn van Oosterhout 07:11
On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson 08:07
Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson 08:22
Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Martijn van Oosterhout 09:04
Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup John Gray 09:14
Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup John Gray 10:16
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Sander Steffann 11:47
Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout 14:22
Re: On-Disk Tuple Size Tom Lane 15:27
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane 15:57
Re: Documentation on page files Tom Lane 16:16
Re: Improved scanner performance Peter Eisentraut 17:20
Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane 17:25
Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang "." 23:33

April 21, 2002

Thread Author Time
Implement a .NET Data Provider Francisco Jr. 00:11
Re: syslog support by default Tatsuo Ishii 00:22
Re: syslog support by default Tom Lane 00:35
Re: Improved scanner performance Tom Lane 02:05
Foreign keys and indexes. Rod Taylor 02:07
Re: Foreign keys and indexes. Rod Taylor 02:16
Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang Peter Eisentraut 04:53
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Curt Sampson 04:59
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson 06:35
Re: Documentation on page files Curt Sampson 06:46
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson 07:46
Re: Implement a .NET Data Provider Jean-Michel POURE 08:15
Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout 09:28
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Rod Taylor 13:28
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Sander Steffann 14:05
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane 14:39
failed regression tests Thomas Lockhart 17:19
Re: [HACKERS] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY 📎 Gavin Sherry 17:39
Re: failed regression tests Peter Eisentraut 17:45
Re: failed regression tests Thomas Lockhart 17:57
Re: Foreign keys and indexes. Tom Lane 18:26
Re: Really annoying comments... Dave Page 18:37
Re: Really annoying comments... Tom Lane 18:44
Re: Really annoying comments... Dave Page 18:49
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Curt Sampson 19:03
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Tom Lane 19:10
Re: [INTERFACES] sqlbang "." 19:34
Re: On-disk Tuple Size Curt Sampson 19:50
Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 20:02
Re: Really annoying comments... Rod Taylor 20:09
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 20:27
Coster/planner and edge cases... Michael Loftis 20:30
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 20:41
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 20:50
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 20:57
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 20:59
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 21:02
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 21:10
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 21:13
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway 21:14
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 21:22
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 21:24
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 21:25
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 21:33
pgsql/src/backend commands/variable.c parser/g ... Thomas Lockhart 21:37
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway 21:37
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 21:47
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway 21:50
GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane 21:52
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 21:53
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart 22:01
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 22:06
Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Tom Lane 22:06
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Peter Eisentraut 22:06
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Tom Lane 22:11
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane 22:16
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart 22:32
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Joe Conway 22:35
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 22:36
Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Michael Loftis 22:48
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Michael Loftis 22:52
Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Tom Lane 23:05
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart 23:22
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart 23:36
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane 23:53
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Tom Lane 23:57
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Peter Eisentraut 23:59

April 22, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: GUC vs variable.c (was Patches applied...) Thomas Lockhart 00:06
Re: failed regression tests Tatsuo Ishii 01:27
How to know whether a table is locked ? Nicolas Bazin 02:00
Re: commands subdirectory continued -code cleanup Christopher Kings-Lynne 02:11
Re: Patches applied; initdb time! Thomas Lockhart 02:57
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Peter Eisentraut 03:14
Re: Schema (namespace) privilege details Tom Lane 03:25
few probs with integer timestamps Christopher Kings-Lynne 04:55
Re: few probs with integer timestamps Thomas Lockhart 05:54
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro 10:13
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE 📎 Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro 11:58
Fixups on variable.c Thomas Lockhart 15:19
Re: Documentation on page files Ross J. Reedstrom 16:14
Bug #640: ECPG: inserting float numbers pgsql-bugs 16:41
[RFC] Set Returning Functions Joe Conway 17:16
Re: Documentation on page files Patrick Macdonald 17:57
Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Tom Lane 20:23
What is wrong with hashed index usage? Dann Corbit 21:15
Re: Implement a .NET Data Francisco Jr. 21:35
Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Neil Conway 21:59
Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Dann Corbit 22:04
Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Neil Conway 22:13
ecpg/preproc.y is generating reduce/reduce conflicts Tom Lane 22:46
NAMEDATALEN revisited 📎 Rod Taylor 23:25
Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout 23:29
Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Michael Loftis 23:47

April 23, 2002

Thread Author Time
Re: Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Joe Conway 03:35
Re: Simplifying OID lookups in the presence of namespaces Tom Lane 03:46
I am back Bruce Momjian 04:33
"make report" Thomas Lockhart 05:20
Re: "make report" cbbrowne 05:39
Re: Documentation on page files Hannu Krosing 07:15
Re: Implement a .NET Data Dave Page 07:25
Re: Documentation on page files Martijn van Oosterhout 07:52
Re: "make report" Curt Sampson 08:18
Re: Documentation on page files Curt Sampson 08:22
cvs update, configure, make, error in bootstrap.* ?... Jean-Paul ARGUDO 08:42
Generating Huge String? Steffen Nielsen 08:55
Re: Generating Huge String? Tom Lane 13:49
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Lamar Owen 14:13
Re: cvs update, configure, make, error in bootstrap.* ?... Tom Lane 14:24
Re: "make report" Tom Lane 16:02
Re: [HACKERS] WITH DELIMITERS in COPY Bruce Momjian 16:19
Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian 16:27
Re: cvs update, configure, make, error in bootstrap.* ?... Jean-Paul ARGUDO 16:40
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian 16:41
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Bruce Momjian 16:42
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bradley McLean 16:43
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian 16:46
Re: [HACKERS] build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware Bruce Momjian 16:51
Re: Odd(?) RI-trigger behavior Bruce Momjian 16:55
Re: syslog support by default Bruce Momjian 16:59
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Jan Wieck 16:59
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane 17:09
Re: new food for the contrib/ directory Bruce Momjian 17:29
Re: PyGreSQL bug Bruce Momjian 17:31
Re: My talk at Linuxtag Bruce Momjian 17:46
Re: RENAME TRIGGER patch (was [HACKERS] Odd(?) RI-trigger Bruce Momjian 18:07
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Joe Conway 18:27
Re: Documentation on page files Hannu Krosing 18:59
Re: Generating Huge String? Steffen Nielsen 20:17
Re: Coster/planner and edge cases... Bruce Momjian 20:26
Re: How to know whether a table is locked ? Bruce Momjian 20:55
Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut 23:30
Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? 📎 Bruce Momjian 23:46
Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage? Bruce Momjian 23:54

April 24, 2002

Thread Author Time
timeout implementation issues Nicolas Bazin 00:04
Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Peter Eisentraut 00:24
Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Bruce Momjian 00:57
Re: ?Missing '#define FUNC_MAX_ARGS' in pg_config.h.win32? Peter Eisentraut 01:10
Re: Patch for xlog.c Bruce Momjian 01:56
Re: build of 7.2.1 on SCO Openserver and Unixware 7.1.1 Bruce Momjian 01:57
Re: unknownin/out patch (was [HACKERS] PQescapeBytea is not Bruce Momjian 02:13
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Bruce Momjian 02:21
Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts Bruce Momjian 02:22
namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) 📎 Rod Taylor 02:36
Re: RENAME TRIGGER patch (was [HACKERS] Odd(?) RI-trigger Bruce Momjian 02:48
Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Neil Conway 02:50
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw 02:50
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw 03:02
Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Rod Taylor 03:12
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Curt Sampson 04:38
Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane 05:40
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut 05:41
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Philip Warner 05:58
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue 06:13
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Lincoln Yeoh 07:12
Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Curt Sampson 07:51
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE mlw 12:28
Returning text from stored procedures?? Steffen Nielsen 13:44
Re: "make report" Thomas Lockhart 13:55
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Bruce Momjian 13:56
Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Bruce Momjian 13:57
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch 📎 Bruce Momjian 14:03
WAL -> Replication Mike Biamonte 14:05
Re: Sequential Scan Read-Ahead Bruce Momjian 14:08
Re: namedatalen part 2 (cont'd) Tom Lane 14:20
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Thomas Lockhart 14:23
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni 14:28
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane 14:30
Table checking/dumping program Martijn van Oosterhout 14:57
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Tom Lane 15:31
Re: Returning text from stored procedures?? Tom Lane 15:43
Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro 16:32
Parser translations and schemas Tom Lane 16:53
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Mario Weilguni 17:02
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Michael Loftis 17:33
Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut 18:14
Re: "make report" Igor Kovalenko 18:19
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Vince Vielhaber 18:20
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Peter Eisentraut 18:24
Re: Parser translations and schemas Peter Eisentraut 18:28
non-standard escapes in string literals Andrew Pimlott 18:29
Re: "make report" Peter Eisentraut 18:34
Re: Implement a .NET Data Francisco Jr. 21:15
Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch Tom Lane 22:13
PostgreSQL index usage discussion. mlw 22:46
Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction Hiroshi Inoue 23:42

Browse Archives

Prev | Next
Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30