This page describes best practices to improve performance and data usage for time series collections.
Compression Best Practices
To optimize data compression for time series collections, perform the following actions:
Omit Fields Containing Empty Objects and Arrays from Documents
If your data contains empty objects, arrays, or strings, omit the empty fields from your documents to optimize compression.
For example, consider the following documents:
{ timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), coordinates: [1.0, 2.0] }, { timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:10.441Z"), coordinates: [] }, { timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:20.441Z"), coordinates: [3.0, 5.0] }
coordinates
fields with populated values and coordinates
fields with an empty array result in a schema change for the compressor. The schema change causes the second and third documents in the sequence to remain uncompressed.
Optimize compression by omitting the fields with empty values, as shown in the following documents:
{ timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), coordinates: [1.0, 2.0] }, { timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:10.441Z") }, { timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:20.441Z"), coordinates: [3.0, 5.0] }
Round Numeric Data to Few Decimal Places
Round numeric data to the precision that your application requires. Rounding numeric data to fewer decimal places improves the compression ratio.
Inserts Best Practices
To optimize insert performance for time series collections, perform the following actions:
Batch Document Writes
When inserting multiple documents:
To avoid network roundtrips, use a single
insertMany()
statement as opposed to multipleinsertOne()
statements.If possible, insert data that contains identical
metaField
values in the same batches.Set the
ordered
parameter tofalse
.
For example, if you have two sensors that correspond to two metaField
values, sensor A
and sensor B
, a batch that contains multiple measurements from a single sensor incurs the cost of one insert, rather than one insert per measurement.
The following operation inserts six documents, but only incurs the cost of two inserts (one per metaField
value), because the documents are ordered by sensor. The ordered
parameter is set to false
to improve performance:
db.temperatures.insertMany( [ { metaField: { sensor: "sensorA" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 10 }, { metaField: { sensor: "sensorA" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-19T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 12 }, { metaField: { sensor: "sensorA" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-20T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 13 }, { metaField: { sensor: "sensorB" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 20 }, { metaField: { sensor: "sensorB" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-19T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 25 }, { metadField: { sensor: "sensorB" }, timestamp: ISODate("2021-05-20T00:00:00.000Z"), temperature: 26 } ], { "ordered": false } )
Use Consistent Field Order in Documents
Using a consistent field order in your documents improves insert performance.
For example, inserting the following documents, all of which have the same field order, results in optimal insert performance.
{ _id: ObjectId("6250a0ef02a1877734a9df57"), timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z"), name: "sensor1", range: 1 }, { _id: ObjectId("6560a0ef02a1877734a9df66"), timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T01:00:00.441Z"), name: "sensor1", range: 5 }
In contrast, the following documents do not achieve optimal insert performance, because their field orders differ:
{ range: 1, _id: ObjectId("6250a0ef02a1877734a9df57"), name: "sensor1", timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T00:00:00.441Z") }, { _id: ObjectId("6560a0ef02a1877734a9df66"), name: "sensor1", timestamp: ISODate("2020-01-23T01:00:00.441Z"), range: 5 }
Increase the Number of Clients
Increasing the number of clients that write data to your collections can improve performance.
Sharding Best Practices
To optimize sharding on your time series collection, perform the following action:
Use the metaField
as your Shard Key
Using the metaField
to shard your collection provides sufficienct cardinality as a shard key for time series collections.
Note
Starting in MongoDB 8.0, the use of the timeField
as a shard key in time series collections is deprecated.
Query Best Practices
To optimize queries on your time series collection, perform the following actions:
Set a Strategic metaField
When Creating the Collection
Your choice of metaField
has the biggest impact on optimizing queries in your application.
Select fields that rarely or never change as part of your metaField.
If possible, select identifiers or other stable values that are common in filter expressions as part of your metaField.
Avoid selecting fields that are not used for filtering as part of your metaField. Instead, use those fields as measurements.
For more information, see metaField Considerations.
Set Appropriate Bucket Granularity
When you create a time series collection, MongoDB groups incoming time series data into buckets. By accurately setting granularity, you control how frequently data is bucketed based on the ingestion rate of your data.
Starting in MongoDB 6.3, you can use the custom bucketing parameters bucketMaxSpanSeconds
and bucketRoundingSeconds
to specify bucket boundaries and more precisely control how time series data is bucketed.
You can improve performance by setting the granularity
or custom bucketing parameters to the best match for the time span between incoming measurements from the same data source. For example, if you are recording weather data from thousands of sensors but only record data from each sensor once per 5 minutes, you can either set granularity
to "minutes"
or set the custom bucketing parameters to 300
(seconds).
In this case, setting the granularity
to hours
groups up to a month's worth of data ingest events into a single bucket, resulting in longer traversal times and slower queries. Setting it to seconds
leads to multiple buckets per polling interval, many of which might contain only a single document.
The following table shows the maximum time interval included in one bucket of data when using a given granularity
value:
granularity | granularity bucket limit |
---|---|
| 1 hour |
| 24 hours |
| 30 days |
Create Secondary Indexes
To improve query performance, create one or more secondary indexes on your timeField
and metaField
to support common query patterns. In versions 6.3 and higher, MongoDB creates a secondary index on the timeField
and metaField
automatically.
Additional Index Best Practices
Use the metaField index for filtering and equality.
Use the timeField and other indexed fields for range queries.
General indexing strategies also apply to time series collections. For more information, see Indexing Strategies.
Query the metaField
on Sub-Fields
MongoDB reorders the metaField
of time-series collections, which may cause servers to store data in a different field order than applications. If a metaField
is an object, queries on the metaField
may produce inconsistent results because metaField
order may vary between servers and applications. To optimize queries on a time-series metaField
, query the metaField
on scalar sub-fields rather than the entire metaField
.
The following example creates a time series collection:
db.weather.insertMany( [ { metaField: { sensorId: 5578, type: "temperature" }, timestamp: ISODate( "2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z" ), temp: 12 }, { metaField: { sensorId: 5578, type: "temperature" }, timestamp: ISODate( "2021-05-18T04:00:00.000Z" ), temp: 11 } ] )
The following query on the sensorId
and type
scalar sub-fields returns the first document that matches the query criteria:
db.weather.findOne( { "metaField.sensorId": 5578, "metaField.type": "temperature" } )
Example output:
{ _id: ObjectId("6572371964eb5ad43054d572"), metaField: { sensorId: 5578, type: 'temperature' }, timestamp: ISODate( "2021-05-18T00:00:00.000Z" ), temp: 12 }
Use $group Instead of Distinct()
Due to the unique data structure of time series collections, MongoDB can't efficiently index them for distinct values. Avoid using the distinct
command or db.collection.distinct()
helper method on time series collections. Instead, use a $group
aggregation to group documents by distinct values.
For example, to query for distinct meta.type
values on documents where meta.project = 10
, instead of:
db.foo.distinct("meta.type", {"meta.project": 10})
Use:
db.foo.createIndex({"meta.project":1, "meta.type":1}) db.foo.aggregate([{$match: {"meta.project": 10}}, {$group: {_id: "$meta.type"}}])
This works as follows:
Creating a compound index on
meta.project
andmeta.type
and supports the aggregation.The
$match
stage filters for documents wheremeta.project = 10
.The
$group
stage usesmeta.type
as the group key to output one document per unique value.