Ruby on Rails VS TypeScript

Django needs a marketing push. I opened the website and immediately it smells like a 2011 web framework. Like CakePHP. Like Zend. Like Kohana.

The site makes the project feel extremely dated, which of course I have no idea how true that is, I've never used Django! Just my 2c from an outsider.

I compare it to Phoenix and Rails. (again, talking PURELY marketing here dudes!)

https://www.phoenixframework.org/

https://rubyonrails.org/

Previous value: nil New value: false Purpose: To understand the impact of enabling this particular flag I had to go through some PRs on rails official repo and came across the following PR. The description of which provides an important hint towards a bug that exists with the deprecated behavior of comparing AC::Parameters with a Hash

From there, I went into a long phase of copy & paste: throw code at an LLM, ask it to analyze or rewrite, and stitch the result back in. It kind of worked. When reasoning models arrived, my confidence went up: wait a minute, wait three—freshly baked code appears. In Rails, that meant small adjustments and I was done. In Marten, I had to correct more, which made sense — newer framework, less model knowledge.

> they often automatically pluralize, with the predictable result of seeing tables with names like addresss.

This is a very poor example, that case is literally in their unit tests file:

https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/b0c813bc7b61c71dd21ee3a6...

Full list of changes:

https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v8.1.0.beta1

Ruby on Rails (developer-friendly, great for startups)

TypeScript公式サイト

There's also a slight performance caveat when it comes to interfaces vs intersections (&) to keep in mind: https://github.com/microsoft/Typescript/wiki/Performance#pre...

Tip: You can find official docs and guides at typescriptlang. org.

Node.js and TypeScript installed locally

Language: TypeScript (for type safety and better developer tooling)

It's extremely popular in React, Node.js, and full-stack TypeScript applications because it provides:

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/blob/main/LICENSE.tx...

The license is Apache 2.0. With the trademark, they can tell everyone not to call their thing TypeScript but at this point, given the license, they cant't tell them not to copy it and change it and distribute that new thing (assuming the new distributors do so under the correct conditions).

TypeScript

}

But that is not the case, so you’d need a single cast to make it work (from number to ClampedNumber<1,200>) or however exactly you’d want to express this.

Tbf having looked more closely into how typescript handles number range types, I don’t think I would ever use them. Not very expressive or clear. I think I hallucinated something closer to what is in this proposal: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/43505

I still think that the general idea of communicating what acceptable input is via the type system is a good one. But the specifics of doing that with numbers isn’t great in typescript yet.