Flutter VS sdk

Flutter is a popular hybrid mobile app framework developed by Google. It allows developers to build cross-platform applications using a single codebase written in Dart. Unlike many frameworks, Flutter uses its own rendering engine to draw UI components, ensuring consistent design and performance across devices. This approach delivers near-native performance and highly customizable user interfaces. With features like hot reload and a rich widget library, Flutter is widely used for building fast, visually appealing, and scalable mobile applications.

# Inside Ubuntu proot apt update && apt install -y curl git unzip xz-utils zip openjdk-17-jdk # Clone Flutter (ARM64 compatible) cd /root git clone https://github.com/flutter/flutter.git -b stable --depth 1 export PATH=/root/flutter/bin:$PATH # Let Dart figure itself out flutter precache --linux flutter doctor

Not all semantic properties work the same way across platforms. Some platforms support certain properties. Others might behave differently. For example, headingLevel only works on Flutter web. Native iOS supports heading levels. Flutter doesn’t wire this through on iOS (there’s an open issue in the Flutter tracker). Android doesn’t even have the concept of heading levels.

Flutter offers an alternative approach when we need truly native performance or access to device-specific features that web APIs don't expose. The Dart language provides strong typing similar to TypeScript, and the framework renders using native components rather than WebView. For AI applications, Flutter's isolates handle background processing without blocking the UI, essential when you're running lighter ML models on-device for offline functionality.

Flutter : Obviously 😂

With the app market projected to reach over $500 billion by 2025, integrating AI isn't just advantageous—it's essential for staying competitive. Whether you're building a mobile app for education, a web platform for e-commerce, or an enterprise tool for data analysis, AI can accelerate development cycles, reduce costs, and enhance functionality. However, effectiveness depends on context: the app's purpose, your team's expertise, and scalability requirements. As we navigate this topic, remember that the "best" tool often involves combining several for optimal results.

There are more than 10 built-in ways to find the widgets. On this article Only the most reliable and used will be shown, but, if you want to see all of them, check them here.

Development Speed and Learning Curve When examining React Native vs Flutter from a development perspective, both frameworks offer rapid prototyping capabilities. React Native leverages JavaScript, making it accessible to web developers who can quickly transition to mobile development. This familiarity factor often gives React Native an edge for startups with existing web development teams. Flutter, conversely, uses Dart programming language, which presents a steeper learning curve. However, once developers master Dart, Flutter's hot reload feature and comprehensive widget library enable incredibly fast development cycles. The React Native vs Flutter comparison in terms of development speed often depends on your team's existing skill set.

In accordance with Dart SDK Issue 57112, the language experiment flags are intended to work seamlessly with the latest language version. However, when you switch to the Flutter master branch, like in your case, discrepancies can arise, resulting in errors related to experimental features.

Here's the cons from my experience.

Dart does not cross-compile, it's still an issue to this day and there haven't been any plans to fix that yet from what I can tell. https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/28617

Another slight issue I've found is the error message it spits out is kinda unhelpful most of the time, but that issue also applies to Flutter. The stacktrace is like 100 lines with only the five first rows is helpful, the rest is internal code.

Dart lacks a repl (there is this package called Interactive but it's a hacky solution).

One last thing I do not enjoy about Dart is that even if the code compiles, you are not guaranteed that the massive refactor you did is "sound", that will say, errors can popup during runtime, so you have to write tests for every part. This is such a bummer because in Java, if I do a large refactor and the linter, ide and compiler is happy, then you will likely be rest assured that the program will run fine (JavaFX is a exception).

Dart is a language meant for ui development, nothing else. The team doesn't seem interested in splitting up the language from the Flutter framework. There have been tons of work from the community to provide tools for standalone application / backend development (see Shoelace and Serverpod).

The pros is a beautiful, expressive language with awesome DX. Good range of packages available and easy to meta-program with, it's not on the Ruby level but with "extensions" you can do lots of fun stuff. Dart deserves more love than what it currently gets.

I’m not a Dart fan so maybe I’m biased, but wow this (from the article) a failure on many levels: https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/issues/56609

Yes, the basics are there in Smalltalk and there's more support built into Erlang.

Also:

"Live program changes in the Dart VM"

https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/main/docs/Hot-reload.m...

"Live reloading for your ESP32"

https://github.com/toitlang/jaguar

Related Issue link: Platform.localHostname fails on Chinese Windows

https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/graphs/contributors

As for flutterfoundation.dev, it appears to be just Matt? Who used to be employed at Google and reported to me on the Flutter team but is no longer.