Java Deadlocks and Synchronization

volatile can be used for blocking threads, while synchronized cannot

volatile ensures visibility of variables across threads, while synchronized ensures mutual exclusion

volatile guarantees atomicity, while synchronized does not

volatile prevents deadlocks, while synchronized does not

To guarantee that the method is executed by a single thread

To pause threads for a set period

To ensure that multiple threads are executed simultaneously

To prevent thread starvation

It provides an atomic way of accessing a shared resource

It supports interruptible lock acquisition

It uses volatile variables to prevent race conditions

It synchronizes method calls automatically

Use of Atomic class

Local framework synchronization

Synchronization on a method level

Usage of volatile keyword

When threads are not given enough CPU time

When two threads are blocked forever, each waiting for the other

When one thread keeps waiting for user input

When threads stop responding to external signals

Threads wait indefinitely and do not proceed with execution

Threads run faster than usual

Threads can execute without interruption

Threads are killed automatically

Allowing only one thread to execute at a time

Using lock ordering to acquire resources

Synchronizing all threads in the program

None of the above

Thread 1 holds Lock A and is waiting for Lock B, while Thread 2 holds Lock B and is waiting for Lock A

Two threads are accessing the same resource at different times

One thread has completed execution, and the other is waiting for its result

Threads are executed in a random order