This section contains the code and execution plans for Chapter 6, “Sorting and Grouping” in a PostgreSQL database.
Indexed Order By
DROP INDEX sales_date; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date, product_id); EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date, product_id;
The execution does not perform a sort operation:
QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------- Index Scan using sales_dt_pr (cost=0.01..680.86 rows=376) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
PostgreSQL uses the same execution plan, when sorting by PRODUCT_ID
only.
EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY product_id;
Using an greater or equals condition requires an Sort operation:
EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY product_id;
Although the row estimate got lower, causing the cost also to be lower:
QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------- Sort (cost=8.50..8.50 rows=1 width=32) Sort Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr (cost=0.00..8.49 rows=1) Index Cond: (sale_date >= (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
Indexing ASC, DESC and NULLS FIRST/LAST
Scanning an index backwards:
EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date DESC, product_id DESC;
Mixing ASC
and DESC
causes an explicit sort:
EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date ASC, product_id DESC;
Ordering the index with mixed ASC
/DESC
modifiers:
DROP INDEX sales_dt_pr; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date ASC, product_id DESC); EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date ASC, product_id DESC;
PostgreSQL orders NULLS LAST
per default. However, the DESC
modifier puts them to the front, so that DESC NULLS LAST
must sort explicitly:
EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date ASC, product_id DESC NULLS LAST;
PostgreSQL allows explicit NULLS LAST
indexing as well, so it becomes a pipelined order by
again:
DROP INDEX sales_dt_pr; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date ASC, product_id DESC NULLS LAST); EXPLAIN SELECT sale_date, product_id, quantity FROM sales WHERE sale_date >= now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY ORDER BY sale_date ASC, product_id DESC NULLS LAST;
Indexed Group By
The PostgreSQL (at least 9.0-13) database seems to have a little glitch, that makes the following not work as pipelined order by
, when the index has NULLS LAST
, as created above:
EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id;
QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HashAggregate (cost=574.21..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
Removing the NULLS LAST
clause from the index reveals something interesting:
DROP INDEX sales_dt_pr; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date ASC, product_id DESC); EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id;
QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GroupAggregate (cost=0.43..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan Backward using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
The index is read backwards, although the SQL statement does not require it. It seems like PostgreSQL uses an GROUP BY PRODUCT_ID
internally, to fetch the pre-sorted result. The next case adds an order by
clause in opposite order.
EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id ORDER BY product_id DESC;
QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GroupAggregate (cost=0.43..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
So, it seems that the implicit order by
is not hardcoded. Our next test show that PostgreSQL can actually use such an index, but only if an explicit order by
clause asks for the same order:
DROP INDEX sales_dt_pr; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date ASC, product_id DESC NULLS LAST); EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id ORDER BY product_id DESC NULLS LAST;
QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GroupAggregate (cost=0.43..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
It does a pipelined group by
, even when the index is defined NULLS LAST
when the order by clause explicitly sorts the same way. Otherwise, it uses an internal order by clause that disregards the indexes NULLS
specification.
Further testing shows that the problem exists for ASC
indexes with NULLS FIRST
:
DROP INDEX sales_dt_pr; CREATE INDEX sales_dt_pr ON sales (sale_date ASC, product_id ASC NULLS FIRST); EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id ORDER BY product_id ASC NULLS FIRST;
QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GroupAggregate (cost=0.43..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))
But skipping order b
y clause:
EXPLAIN SELECT product_id, SUM(eur_value) FROM sales WHERE sale_date = now() - INTERVAL '1' DAY GROUP BY product_id;
QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HashAggregate (cost=574.21..574.53 rows=26 width=40) Group Key: product_id -> Index Scan using sales_dt_pr on sales (cost=0.43..572.62 rows=318 width=14) Index Cond: (sale_date = (now() - '1 day'::interval day))