Skip to content

Conversation

@dora1998
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

Allow nullish coalescing for a naked type parameter because it might be nullable.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @dora1998!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 15, 2023

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a1c766c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/643ce33c777a170007d0cb9f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-6910--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 15, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #6910 (a1c766c) into main (40f4eee) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #6910 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 87.36% 87.37% ======================================= Files 386 386 Lines 13189 13192 +3 Branches 3866 3867 +1 ======================================= + Hits 11523 11526 +3  Misses 1300 1300 Partials 366 366 
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 87.37% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...slint-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-condition.ts 98.37% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

armano2
armano2 previously approved these changes Apr 15, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for just the case of a type parameter, thanks! Just requesting a bit more test coverage please. ✨

}
`,
`
function test<T>(a: T) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Testing] The cases of T extends 'a' (always truthy) and T extends 'a' | null (still needing ??) seem to work, but aren't explicitly covered for ?? cases. Could you add in a couple more unit tests along those lines please?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh sorry, I added them!
I also added a alwaysNullish case 😄

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Apr 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 3e5f858 into typescript-eslint:main Apr 17, 2023
@dora1998 dora1998 deleted the fix-no-unnecessary-condition branch April 17, 2023 14:39
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party

3 participants