Add unittest for PubSub.connect()

[kristjanvalur]

Pull Request check-list

Please make sure to review and check all of these items:

• Does $ tox pass with this change (including linting)?
• Do the CI tests pass with this change (enable it first in your forked repo and wait for the github action build to finish)?
• Is the new or changed code fully tested?
• Is a documentation update included (if this change modifies existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
• Is there an example added to the examples folder (if applicable)?
• Was the change added to CHANGES file?

NOTE: these things are not required to open a PR and can be done
afterwards / while the PR is open.

Description of change

Issue #2089 demonstrates how it was difficult to keep a PubSub loop running in face of ConnectionError since the
message getting methods don't automatically reconnect.

After PR #2148 it is now possible to call PubSub.connect() to refresh connectivity as part of a handling loop.

This PR adds a unittest which tests that such a loop successfully reconnects after being disconnected.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #2167 (994da43) into master (5c99e27) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2167 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 91.98% 92.01% +0.02%  ========================================== Files 105 105 Lines 25287 25334 +47 ========================================== + Hits 23260 23310 +50  + Misses 2027 2024 -3 

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
tests/test_asyncio/test_pubsub.py	99.40% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
tests/test_asyncio/test_search.py	98.35% <0.00%> (-0.33%)	⬇️
tests/test_cluster.py	97.48% <0.00%> (ø)
redis/asyncio/connection.py	84.83% <0.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
redis/asyncio/client.py	92.85% <0.00%> (+0.69%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5c99e27...994da43. Read the comment docs.

[dvora-h]

Thanks @kristjanvalur! Great to see improvements for our tests