Skip to content

Conversation

@naitoh
Copy link
Contributor

@naitoh naitoh commented Mar 20, 2024

Why?

attributes[name] is faster than attribute.has_key?(name) in Micro Benchmark.

However, the Benchmark did not show a significant difference.
Would like to merge if possible, how about it?

See: #119 (comment)

Micro Benchmark

$ cat benchmark/attributes.yaml loop_count: 100000 contexts: - name: No YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' - name: YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' RubyVM::YJIT.enable prelude: | attributes = {} name = :a benchmark: 'attributes[name]' : attributes[name] 'attributes.has_key?(name)' : attributes.has_key?(name) 
$ benchmark-driver benchmark/attributes.yaml Calculating ------------------------------------- No YJIT YJIT attributes[name] 53.362M 53.562M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.001874s 0.001867s attributes.has_key?(name) 45.025M 45.005M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.002221s 0.002222s Comparison: attributes[name] YJIT: 53561863.6 i/s No YJIT: 53361791.1 i/s - 1.00x slower attributes.has_key?(name) No YJIT: 45024765.3 i/s YJIT: 45004502.0 i/s - 1.00x slower 

Benchmark

RUBYLIB= BUNDLER_ORIG_RUBYLIB= /Users/naitoh/.rbenv/versions/3.3.0/bin/ruby -v -S benchmark-driver /Users/naitoh/ghq/github.com/naitoh/rexml/benchmark/parse.yaml ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin22] Calculating ------------------------------------- before after before(YJIT) after(YJIT) dom 10.786 10.783 18.196 17.959 i/s - 100.000 times in 9.270908s 9.273657s 5.495854s 5.568326s sax 30.213 30.430 57.030 56.672 i/s - 100.000 times in 3.309845s 3.286240s 1.753459s 1.764551s pull 35.211 35.259 70.817 70.784 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.840056s 2.836136s 1.412098s 1.412754s stream 34.281 34.475 63.084 62.978 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.917067s 2.900689s 1.585196s 1.587860s Comparison: dom before(YJIT): 18.2 i/s after(YJIT): 18.0 i/s - 1.01x slower before: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower after: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower sax before(YJIT): 57.0 i/s after(YJIT): 56.7 i/s - 1.01x slower after: 30.4 i/s - 1.87x slower before: 30.2 i/s - 1.89x slower pull before(YJIT): 70.8 i/s after(YJIT): 70.8 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 35.3 i/s - 2.01x slower before: 35.2 i/s - 2.01x slower stream before(YJIT): 63.1 i/s after(YJIT): 63.0 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 34.5 i/s - 1.83x slower before: 34.3 i/s - 1.84x slower 
  • YJIT=ON : 0.98x - 1.00x faster
  • YJIT=OFF : 1.00x - 1.00x faster
## Why? `attributes[name]` is faster than `attribute.has_key?(name)` in Micro Benchmark. However, the Benchmark did not show a significant difference. Would like to merge if possible, how about it? See: ruby#119 (comment) ## Micro Benchmark ``` $ cat benchmark/attributes.yaml loop_count: 100000 contexts: - name: No YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' - name: YJIT prelude: | $LOAD_PATH.unshift(File.expand_path("lib")) require 'rexml' RubyVM::YJIT.enable prelude: | attributes = {} name = :a benchmark: 'attributes[name]' : attributes[name] 'attributes.has_key?(name)' : attributes.has_key?(name) ``` ``` $ benchmark-driver benchmark/attributes.yaml Calculating ------------------------------------- No YJIT YJIT attributes[name] 53.362M 53.562M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.001874s 0.001867s attributes.has_key?(name) 45.025M 45.005M i/s - 100.000k times in 0.002221s 0.002222s Comparison: attributes[name] YJIT: 53561863.6 i/s No YJIT: 53361791.1 i/s - 1.00x slower attributes.has_key?(name) No YJIT: 45024765.3 i/s YJIT: 45004502.0 i/s - 1.00x slower ``` ## Benchmark ``` RUBYLIB= BUNDLER_ORIG_RUBYLIB= /Users/naitoh/.rbenv/versions/3.3.0/bin/ruby -v -S benchmark-driver /Users/naitoh/ghq/github.com/naitoh/rexml/benchmark/parse.yaml ruby 3.3.0 (2023-12-25 revision 5124f9ac75) [arm64-darwin22] Calculating ------------------------------------- before after before(YJIT) after(YJIT) dom 10.786 10.783 18.196 17.959 i/s - 100.000 times in 9.270908s 9.273657s 5.495854s 5.568326s sax 30.213 30.430 57.030 56.672 i/s - 100.000 times in 3.309845s 3.286240s 1.753459s 1.764551s pull 35.211 35.259 70.817 70.784 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.840056s 2.836136s 1.412098s 1.412754s stream 34.281 34.475 63.084 62.978 i/s - 100.000 times in 2.917067s 2.900689s 1.585196s 1.587860s Comparison: dom before(YJIT): 18.2 i/s after(YJIT): 18.0 i/s - 1.01x slower before: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower after: 10.8 i/s - 1.69x slower sax before(YJIT): 57.0 i/s after(YJIT): 56.7 i/s - 1.01x slower after: 30.4 i/s - 1.87x slower before: 30.2 i/s - 1.89x slower pull before(YJIT): 70.8 i/s after(YJIT): 70.8 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 35.3 i/s - 2.01x slower before: 35.2 i/s - 2.01x slower stream before(YJIT): 63.1 i/s after(YJIT): 63.0 i/s - 1.00x slower after: 34.5 i/s - 1.83x slower before: 34.3 i/s - 1.84x slower ``` - YJIT=ON : 0.98x - 1.00x faster - YJIT=OFF : 1.00x - 1.00x faster
@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Mar 22, 2024

I checked why [] is faster than has_key? by gdb.
[] is optimized by VM. [] is compiled as optimized operation(?), which is internally implemented as vm_opt_aref().

OK. [] isn't faster than has_key? in REXML but we'll use it.

@kou kou merged commit 030bfb4 into ruby:master Mar 22, 2024
@naitoh naitoh deleted the attributes_name branch March 22, 2024 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants