Skip to content

Conversation

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8963

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 6 New Failures, 7 Pending, 4 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 726eec8 with merge base de14de0 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but was present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member Author

We're going from:

2025-03-17T12:57:12.1247843Z �[31mFAILED�[0m test/test_image.py::�[1mtest_decode_bad_encoded_data[decode_heic-Invalid input: No 'ftyp' box]�[0m - OSError: /opt/conda/envs/ci/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torchvision_extra_decoders/extra_decoders_lib.so: undefined symbol: _ZN5torch3jit17parseSchemaOrNameERKSsb 

To

2025-03-17T12:56:28.1186348Z �[31mFAILED�[0m test/test_image.py::�[1mtest_decode_avif[decode_avif]�[0m - OSError: /opt/conda/envs/ci/bin/../lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.31' not found (required by /opt/conda/envs/ci/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torchvision_extra_decoders/../torchvision_extra_decoders.libs/libheif-2b91cd5e.so.1) 

So this is still progress. Before we had a torch symbol issue, now we have a glibcxx symbol issue. But it's mostly because the machines we're testing on are older than what torchvision-extra-decoder was built on. Sigh. I'll merge this and follow-up. As a first step I'll deactivate the tests but I'll also try to look into building torchvision-extra-decoder` with older dependencies (libheif, libavif) which hopefully won't require recent version symbols.

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit a4d5121 into pytorch:main Mar 17, 2025
42 of 57 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added.
The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

NicolasHug added a commit to NicolasHug/vision that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2025
Reviewed By: scotts Differential Revision: D77998633 fbshipit-source-id: de77886d6950ee37a1a593ca289290eb3601c099
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

2 participants