Skip to content

Conversation

@davidxia
Copy link
Contributor

Allow customizing the webhook K8s Service's name, namespace, and port.

example usage

Look for the new serviceName, serviceNamespace, and servicePort fields.

❯ GOBIN=(pwd)/bin go install ./cmd/* ❯ ./bin/controller-gen webhook -w Webhook +kubebuilder:webhook:admissionReviewVersions=<[]string>,failurePolicy=<string>,groups=<[]string>[,matchPolicy=<string>],mutating=<bool>,name=<string>[,path=<string>][,reinvocationPolicy=<string>],resources=<[]string>[,serviceName=<string>][,serviceNamespace=<string>][,servicePort=<int>][,sideEffects=<string>][,timeoutSeconds=<int>][,url=<string>],verbs=<[]string>,versions=<[]string>[,webhookVersions=<[]string>] package specifies how a webhook should be served. ... 

contributes to #865

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @davidxia. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 17, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 17, 2025
@davidxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

tested manually by

  1. GOBIN=(pwd)/bin go install ./cmd/*
  2. create new kubebuilder-scaffolded project in a directory named project
    a. kubebuilder init --domain tutorial.kubebuilder.io --repo tutorial.kubebuilder.io/project
    b. kubebuilder create api --group batch --version v1 --kind CronJob
    c. kubebuilder create webhook --group batch --version v1 --kind CronJob --defaulting --programmatic-validation
    d. comment out the line namespace: project-system in config/default/kustomization.yaml so it doesn't override the K8s Service namespace we're testing.
  3. copy the ./bin/controller-gen executable into the kubebuilder project's bin/controller-gen-vX.Y.Z path
  4. remove the kubectl apply from the kubebuilder project's Makefile's deploy target

case 1: backwards compatibility

  1. run make deploy and check that kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration and kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration have the same .webhooks[0].clientConfig.service as before.

    apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration metadata: name: project-mutating-webhook-configuration webhooks: - admissionReviewVersions: - v1 clientConfig: service: name: project-webhook-service namespace: system path: /mutate-batch-tutorial-kubebuilder-io-v1-cronjob 
    apiVersion: admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1 kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration metadata: name: project-validating-webhook-configuration webhooks: - admissionReviewVersions: - v1 clientConfig: service: name: project-webhook-service namespace: system path: /validate-batch-tutorial-kubebuilder-io-v1-cronjob 

case 2: modify marker only for MutatingWebhookConfiguration

  1. append serviceName=DEAD,serviceNamespace=BEEF,servicePort=1234 to the line kubebuilder:webhook:path=/mutate-batch-tutorial-kubebuilder-io-v1-cronjob,... in internal/webhook/v1/cronjob_webhook.go

  2. run make deploy and check that kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration has the following.

    kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration metadata: name: project-mutating-webhook-configuration webhooks: - admissionReviewVersions: - v1 clientConfig: service: name: DEAD namespace: BEEF path: /mutate-batch-tutorial-kubebuilder-io-v1-cronjob port: 1234 

    instead of

    kind: MutatingWebhookConfiguration metadata: name: project-mutating-webhook-configuration webhooks: - admissionReviewVersions: - v1 clientConfig: service: name: project-webhook-service namespace: system path: /mutate-batch-tutorial-kubebuilder-io-v1-cronjob 
  3. check that kind: ValidatingWebhookConfiguration has no changes

Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall lgtm so far

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 30, 2025
Allow customizing the webhook K8s Service's name, namespace, and port. ## example usage Look for the new `serviceName`, `serviceNamespace`, and `servicePort` fields. ``` ❯ GOBIN=(pwd)/bin go install ./cmd/* ❯ ./bin/controller-gen webhook -w Webhook +kubebuilder:webhook:admissionReviewVersions=<[]string>,failurePolicy=<string>,groups=<[]string>[,matchPolicy=<string>],mutating=<bool>,name=<string>[,path=<string>][,reinvocationPolicy=<string>],resources=<[]string>[,serviceName=<string>][,serviceNamespace=<string>][,servicePort=<int>][,sideEffects=<string>][,timeoutSeconds=<int>][,url=<string>],verbs=<[]string>,versions=<[]string>[,webhookVersions=<[]string>] package specifies how a webhook should be served. ... ``` contributes to kubernetes-sigs#865 Signed-off-by: David Xia <david@davidxia.com>
@davidxia davidxia marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2025 19:44
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 30, 2025
@davidxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the initial review. Wrote an integration test. Ready for another review.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you!

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: babb9bdd65bafd28d6a0a9743b709b706d2bcc68

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidxia, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit aeb46e2 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 31, 2025
9 checks passed
@davidxia davidxia deleted the patch2 branch January 31, 2025 14:37
@davidxia
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you!

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

You're welcome :) Thx for the PR(s)!

@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2025
v1 = "v1"
defaultWebhookVersion = v1
defaultServiceName = "webhook-service"
defaultServiceNamespace = "system"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@davidxia

It looks like this change may have broken the default behavior 😞

GitHub Actions Run

Is this the intended outcome? Or is it an unexpected side effect of the change?

cc/ @sbueringer

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't see how this change could affect the name of your CRD?

CustomResourceDefinition.apiextensions.k8s.io "project-v4-system" is invalid: metadata.name: Invalid value: "project-v4-system": must be spec.names.plural+"."+spec.group

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At most this will affect the content of *WebhookConfiguration objects

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is meant to be backwards-compat.

I also see

 error when retrieving current configuration of: Resource: "admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1, Resource=mutatingwebhookconfigurations", GroupVersionKind: "admissionregistration.k8s.io/v1, Kind=MutatingWebhookConfiguration" Name: "project-v4-mutating-webhook-configuration/project-v4-serving-cert", Namespace: "" from server for: "STDIN": invalid resource name "project-v4-mutating-webhook-configuration/project-v4-serving-cert": [may not contain '/'] 

Is this another error separate from must be spec.names.plural+?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can close this one, @davidxia, as it's sorted out. I figured out what was wrong—it was my bad. Everything is working as before. Sorry for the unnecessary disturbance!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

4 participants