Are you kidding me - of course it's not a proof. It's already in the description - they are not claiming that they have proven something - they just say it looks like something. It's not even an opinion.
You are dreadfully insistent on proof yet provide none of your own that there is no genocide, despite multiple credible organisations and experts, and the consensus of the international community, contradicting you.
> The Commission concludes on reasonable grounds that the Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit the following actus reus of genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, namely (i) killing members of the group; (ii) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (iii) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and (iv) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
I'm curious what your angle here will be - that these events never happened, that these events don't constitute genocide, or that this isn't "proof."