17
$\begingroup$

Consider the sequence

$$a_n:=\min_{\substack{A\subseteq\mathbb{Z}\\|A|=n}}|(A+A)\cup (A\cdot A)|.$$

This is A263996 in OEIS. (Actually, they restrict to $\mathbb{N}$, but it makes little difference to my question.) Erdős and Szemeredi conjectured $a_n\gg_\epsilon n^{2-\epsilon}$; see problem 52 on erdosproblems.com and references therein.

Question: How does one compute $a_n$?

I have two ideas for this:

  1. Restrict the search to $A\subseteq[-M,M]$ for some $M$. But which $M=M(n)$ is large enough to hit $a_n$?
  2. Get a lower bound on $a_n$ by solving the relaxed version that replaces $\mathbb{Z}$ with $\mathbb{R}$ (this can be computed by quantifier elimination over the reals), and then hunt for $A\subseteq\mathbb{Z}$ that achieves equality in this lower bound. Unfortunately, the relaxation may not be tight. (In fact, it's open whether the sum-product conjecture of Erdős and Szemeredi is equivalent to its analogue over the reals; see exercise 8.3.1 in Tao and Vu's book on additive combinatorics.)

(A part of me wonders how rigorous the entries in A263996 are, since the computation methodology is missing. Another part of me wonders whether A263996 is even computable!)

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In November 2015 - February 2016, there was Al Zimmermann's programming contest on computing some $a_n$. It may be worth it to check archives of its discussion group from around that time for algorithmic insights from the participants. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4 at 11:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MaxAlekseyev - Thanks for the pointer. I flipped through the archived messages, and it looks like they computationally hunted for good As, but they couldn't tell whether the best As they found were optimal. Some of the messages ask how to find a tight lower bound, or a large enough M(n), but no answers are posted. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4 at 12:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ why size of union rather than maximum of the sizes? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4 at 12:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mathworker21 - Erdős and Szemeredi's original paper is written in terms of the union, as is the OEIS entry. The max is within a factor of 2 of the union, so the conjecture with the max is equivalent. I don't know if the union and max versions are computationally equivalent. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 4 at 13:00
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I agree that the maximum is much more natural to compute here. I don't know of any way this can actually be computed precisely, other than finding reasonable candidate examples (as Zimmermann's contest aimed to do) and then comparing those numbers against known theoretical lower bounds, hoping they match up. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 5 at 13:11

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question