3
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\svd{svd}$Consider the SVD of rectangular matrices as operators

$$\svd:\mathbb C^{n\times m}\to \mathbb U_n\times \mathbb D_{n, m}\times\mathbb U_m$$

where $\mathbb U_n$ is the space of $n\times n$ unitary matrices and $\mathbb D_{n, m}$ is the space of real nonnegative diagonal rectangular matrices.

We know that this operator is not well defined, since there's more than one SVD for each matrix.

What I want to know is, there exists a specification of $\svd$ on $\mathbb C^{n\times m}$ that makes it a Borel-measurable function?

I already know that it can't be continuous, and that if I play enough with the signs of the entries, I guess I can make it not even Lebesgue measurable, but what I need here is for just one specification. If I had to try to do it, I guess I'd try to define it locally and then try to glue together the charts, but I feel like it might badly backfire.

(transferred from stackexchange)

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There are wellknown algorithms to do the SVD decomposition, see f.i. Golub/van Loan, Matrix Computations (1996), Alg. 8.6.2. Is it possible that any of these algorithms lead to a non measurable decompoisition? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2021 at 9:39
  • $\begingroup$ You should consider the closed multimap taking M to the set of all triples (U,D,V) (unitary-diagonal-unitary) which are decompositions for M. Then apply the Kuratowski Ryll-Nardzewski measurable selection theorem. If I’m not wrong the map $(U,D,V)\mapsto UDV^*$ is a (smooth) submersion, hence open, hence measurable. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2021 at 10:27
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ in fact if you have your continuous local specifications of SVD you don't have to bother to glue them: take them defined on members of a locally finite open cover $\{O_j\}_{j\in\mathbb N}$ of $\mathbb C^{n\times m}$, say $\text{sdv}_j:O_j\to \mathbb {U}_n\times \mathbb {D}_{n,m}\times \mathbb {U}_m$. Then you just map $M$ to $\text{sdv}_j(M)$ for the first index $j$ such that $M\in O_j$, and this defines a measurable map. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 21, 2021 at 11:26

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.