11
$\begingroup$

Consider Poisson equation $\nabla \cdot (\sigma(x)\nabla u)=0$ in a domain $D$, where $\sigma(x)$ is the spatially dependent conductivity. On the boundary we have $n$ electrodes (Dirichlet BC $u=\text{const}$ on each electrode). And the rest of the boundary is insulating material $du/d\vec n=0$ (Neumann BC). The electrodes do not have any contact impedance.

The Dirichlet-to-Neumann map or Poincare–Steklov operator is the map from voltages to total current on electrodes for a given conductivity distribution (and is a linear map according to Ohm's law and Kirchoff's law (and therefore a matrix)). Given an arbitrary $n\times n$ matrix, is there a way to check if there exist a conductivity distribution which has this matrix as a Dirichlet-to-Neumann map?

I am looking for a computationally fast one hopefully, I don't want to compute the conductivity distribution.

Maybe there are some domain independent restrictions? (I know there are because I've seen them before but I can't find it again). But I was hoping you could improve them when you know the domain. Further I also know that the conductivity is bounded above by some constant. Is there a way to find what restriction on the DtN map this gives?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I find this question very interesting, but I do not fully understand the details. The boundary of $D$ is divided into $n$ parts, the electrodes, right? But then how is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator in $D$ identified with a matrix? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 11:58
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @MateuszKwaśnicki I understand the matrix maps the $n$ values of $u$ on electrodes to the $n$ values of the total current on each electrode, i.e. the integral of the normal derivative of $u$ on that part of $\partial D$. That may be the original meaning of "Dirichlet-to-Neumann map", I guess. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 14:40
  • $\begingroup$ ... more exactly, current = area integral of $\mathbb n\cdot \mathbb j$ where $\mathbb j=-\sigma\nabla u$ (Ohm's law). $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 24, 2018 at 17:16

3 Answers 3

9
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be this matrix. Because of the formula $$\int_D\sigma\nabla u\cdot\nabla v\, dx=\sum_{i,j}a_{ij}U_iI_j,$$ ($U$ for voltages of $u$, $I$ for currents of $v$), we see three necessary conditions:

  • the matrix must be symmetric,
  • it must be positive semi-definite,
  • and $A{\bf1}=0$.

Actually, if $U\ne \mu{\bf1}$, then $u$ is not constant and the choice $v=u$ yields that $\ker A$ is spanned by ${\bf 1}$.

My guess is that every matrix satisfying these restrictions can be such a Dirichlet-to-Neumann map.

Edit. I see another constraint. For the $i$th column is given by the currents $I_j$ when the potential is $1$ on the $i$th electrod and $0$ on the others. By the maximum principle, $0<u<1$ everywhere in $D$. Select a $j\ne i$. Because it achieves its minimum $0$ along the $j$th electrod, the maximum principle tells us that $\nabla u\cdot\vec n$ is $<0$ along it, and therefore $a_{ij}=I_j<0$. To summarize:

the off-diagonal entries of $A$ must be $<0$.

Remark. The facts that $A$ is symmetric, has negative off-diagonal entries, and $A{\bf1}=0$, imply alltogether that $A$ is positive semi-definite and has rank $n-1$. Just apply Perron-Frobenius: the least eigenvalue $\lambda$ of $A$ is simple and is the only one associated with a positive eigenvector. Therefore $\lambda=0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Without further conditions, I think I agree that there are no restrictions. However knowing the location and size of the electrodes and bounds for $\sigma$, you should be able to determine upper bounds for the matrix entries. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 14:55
  • $\begingroup$ Ive seen it stated somewhere that there is some inequality on determinants of submatrices. What is v in your formula? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 14:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @KALLETHEBAWSMAN. For a positive symmetric matrix, the minors satisfy a bunch of inequalities. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 15:56
7
$\begingroup$

In dimensions 3 and higher, and without any constraints on $\sigma$, one can apparently obtain any symmetric matrix $A = (a_{ij})$ such that $a_{ij} < 0$ when $i \ne j$ and $a_{ii} = -\sum_{j \ne i} a_{ij}$, as suggested in Denis Serre's answer. That answer already explains why these conditions are necessary. To see that they are also sufficient, one can approximate electrodes connected by non-crossing wires of given conductance (in the limiting case $\sigma$ is zero outside the wires, and constant in each wire).

In dimension 2, I believe, there are additional geometric constraints (for example, it is not possible to connect the electrodes with non-crossing wires). I bet this has been studied, but I do not know any references.

$\endgroup$
6
$\begingroup$

This question (for two dimensional domains) was answered by Curtis, Ingerman and Morrow, "Circular Graphs and planar Resistor Networks" (1998). Let $a$ be the $n \times n$ response matrix. As already noted, we must have $a_{ij} = a_{ji}$ and $a(1\ 1\ \cdots\ 1)^T=0$. The additional condition is that, if $i_1$, $i_2$, ..., $i_k$ and $j_1$, $j_2$, ..., $j_k$ appear in circular order around the boundary of the network, and $A'$ is the submatrix with rows $i_r$ and columns $j_s$, then $(-1)^k \det A' \geq 0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This survey of Kenyon's is a good source as well arxiv.org/abs/1203.1256 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 21, 2018 at 19:16
  • $\begingroup$ Usefull comment, but this paper is about electrical networks, that is about graphs. This is not exactly the context of the MO question. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22, 2018 at 10:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DenisSerre I think the idea is to first approximate a graph using the idea from Mateus Kwaśnicki's answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 22, 2018 at 13:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.