Skip to main content
We’ve updated our Terms of Service. A new AI Addendum clarifies how Stack Overflow utilizes AI interactions.
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 12, 2020 at 23:00 vote accept Drew
Nov 12, 2020 at 20:13 answer added Gjergji Zaimi timeline score: 7
Nov 12, 2020 at 19:11 comment added Martin Rubey I tried a bit to interpret the right hand side as a suitable specialization of the cycle index series for the species of permutations (i.e., the Frobenius character for the conjugation action of the symmetric group) but I didn't succeed. I would have thought that writing $\frac{1}{n (1-q^n) (1-t^n)}$ as $\frac{1}{(1-q)(1-t)}(n-1)! [n-1]_q! [n-1]_t! \frac{1}{n! [n]_q! [n]_t!}$ would be a good idea, but it seems that it isn't.
Nov 12, 2020 at 18:37 comment added Drew You mean replace the z^n in the rhs with p_n, and then put some symmetric functions in the left hand side somehow, so that where you expand the symmetric functions in single variable z you recover the original?
Nov 12, 2020 at 0:01 comment added user35313 Not an answer, but I am curious if there is a (conjectural?) symmetric function version of your claimed equality, so that we obtain the right hand side by a plethystic substitution into power sums, and the left hand side reduces to what you have there.
Nov 11, 2020 at 23:07 history asked Drew CC BY-SA 4.0