Symfony monitoring library implementation

Valerio Barbera

In the last few months I worked heavily to renovate the monitoring experience for Symfony developers. The Symfony monitoring library is the second most popular library among Inspector’s customers. The first is the Laravel package.

The release of the latest version of the framework brought the opportunity to make the app monitoring experience as easy as never before.

In this article I’ll detail what these changes are, and the impact they have on your monitoring experience in Inspector.

For more technical articles you can follow me on Linkedin or X.

Compatibility With Doctrine 3.x

The latest major version of the most important ORM for Symfony was released at the beginning of this year. And it dropped the support for SQL loggers in favor of a new “Middleware Architecture”. 

We implemented a check inside the bundle to verify what version of Doctrine the application is using to inject a sql logger or a middleware accordingly.

Collect The Route Name

The first implementation of the Symfony monitoring library was using the name of the route to monitor the http traffic against your Symfony application:

Basically when you implement a new route in Symfony you can declare it via an attribute on the Controller’s method:

namespace App\Controller; use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response; use Symfony\Component\Routing\Attribute\Route; class HomeController { #[Route('/', name: 'app_homepage')] public function home() { return new Response('Home Page'); } #[Route('/landing', name: 'app_landing')] public function landing() { return new Response('Landing Page'); } } 

The Route object gets the name of the route as a second parameter, so you can reference this route inside the application using its name instead of writing the path. This allows you to change the url pattern in the future without the need to change it in every line of code it is mentioned.

And if you want to ignore one of them in your monitoring library you had to list the route name in the Inspector yaml configuration file:

inspector: ingestion_key: '%env(INSPECTOR_INGESTION_KEY)%' ignore_routes: - 'app_landing'

The first developer who helped me build the first version of the library didn’t find a way to collect the real url pattern, so we continued with this implementation to not block the work.

But using the route’s name to monitor the HTTP traffic has several disadvantages.

The Problem With Route Names

First the route name is optional. It’s obviously not required to map urls with names in Symfony. So many developers were not using names so as fallback data the library was collecting the ultimate path like: /users/12/profile.

Even worse, someone uses names only for a part of the application, and they saw the transactions list in the dashboard with mixed formats, some endpoints monitored using the route’s name, and others endpoint with url.

The second problem was the ability to ignore url to turn off monitoring in certain parts of the app. A Symfony application is typically segmented using url patterns. Developers tend to group all the admin endpoints under the main url like /admin/[other sub urls] . if you want to ignore parts of your app using wildcards it could be easier if you can reference urls because of this natural association (/users*). It’s more tricky to find a more consistent pattern in route names.

Furthermore the fallback data collected in case the route’s name doesn’t exist was the real url like /users/12/profile. So every time the endpoint was called with a different ID, it generated a new line in the transactions list. Creating too much noise in the monitoring data.

Collect the Route Pattern

Route Patterns are different from the real url your users are calling. Most of the urls you have in your Symfony app are basically parametrized like /users/{id}/profile

This is a typical implementation in a Symfony controller:

namespace App\Controller; use Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\Response; use Symfony\Component\Routing\Attribute\Route; class UserController { #[Route('/users/{id}/profile')] public function profile() { return new Response('Profile Page'); } }

And this is what we need to report in the transactions list instead of the real url. Because even if the ID change is always the same code to be executed.

This change makes it easier to also ignore not only specific urls but also entire parts of your app using the wildcard character in the Inspector configuration file:

inspector: ingestion_key: '%env(INSPECTOR_INGESTION_KEY)%' ignore_routes: - '/admin*'

For more technical articles you can follow me on Linkedin or X.

Monitor your Symfony application for free

Inspector is a Code Execution Monitoring tool specifically designed for software developers. You don’t need to install anything on the infrastructure, just install the Symfony package and you are ready to go.

If you are looking for HTTP monitoring, database query insights, and the ability to forward alerts and notifications into your preferred messaging environment try Inspector for free. Register your account.

Or learn more on the website: https://inspector.dev

Related Posts

Storing LLM Context the Laravel Way: EloquentChatHistory in Neuron AI

I’ve spent the last few weeks working on one of the most important components of Neuron the Chat History. Most solutions treat conversation history in AI Agents forcing you to build everything from scratch. When I saw Laravel developers adopting Neuron AI, I realized they deserved better than that. The current implementation of the ChatHisotry

Managing Human-in-the-Loop With Checkpoints – Neuron Workflow

The integration of human oversight into AI workflows has traditionally been a Python-dominated territory, leaving PHP developers to either compromise on their preferred stack or abandon sophisticated agentic patterns altogether. The new checkpointing feature in Neuron’s Workflow component continues to strengthen the dynamic of bringing production-ready human-in-the-loop capabilities directly to PHP environments. Checkpointing addresses a

Monitor Your PHP Applications Through Your AI Assistant – Inspector MCP server

You push code, hope it works, and discover issues when users complain or error rates spike. Traditional monitoring tools require constant context switching—jumping between your IDE, terminal, dashboard tabs, and documentation. This friction kills productivity and delays problem resolution. Inspector’s new MCP server changes this dynamic by connecting your AI coding assistant directly to your