You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I can't understand why a feature that is so widely used in the real world or that has to be used for SEO would be removed from such a popular library or framework. It feels like a step backwards, and I'm really upset about it. I've been trying to figure out how to implement this feature on my website for about a week now. If I had known that this feature, which is supported by almost all router libraries, would suddenly be removed from here, I wouldn't have chosen it. Of course, I realize that this can be addressed with a single file like catch-slug.tsx or smart-route.tsx, but in my opinion, this only serves to worsen the code and cause bundle size issues by including two route.tsx files in the same file. Removing it might improve the framework's size or speed, but real-world applications often require these features, and a balance needs to be struck. Sacrificing one aspect for the other never felt like the right solution to me. Unfortunately, I've started leaning toward alternatives like tanstack, no matter how long the refactoring process takes. I hope you take everyone's feedback into consideration. Regards.
an example issue
http://localhost:4200/technology -> category.tsx http://localhost:4200/technology/mobile -> category.tsx (conflict with news-detail) http://localhost:4200/technology/mobile/news-123 -> news-detail.tsx http://localhost:4200/technology/news-123 -> news-detail.tsx (conflict with category)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I can't understand why a feature that is so widely used in the real world or that has to be used for SEO would be removed from such a popular library or framework. It feels like a step backwards, and I'm really upset about it. I've been trying to figure out how to implement this feature on my website for about a week now. If I had known that this feature, which is supported by almost all router libraries, would suddenly be removed from here, I wouldn't have chosen it. Of course, I realize that this can be addressed with a single file like catch-slug.tsx or smart-route.tsx, but in my opinion, this only serves to worsen the code and cause bundle size issues by including two route.tsx files in the same file. Removing it might improve the framework's size or speed, but real-world applications often require these features, and a balance needs to be struck. Sacrificing one aspect for the other never felt like the right solution to me. Unfortunately, I've started leaning toward alternatives like tanstack, no matter how long the refactoring process takes. I hope you take everyone's feedback into consideration. Regards.
an example issue
it doesn't work , i got conflicts
related with #8254 #6808 #9278 #10720
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions