Skip to content

Conversation

@Ziinc
Copy link

@Ziinc Ziinc commented Jul 3, 2025

This PR adds in string names for quantum jobs.
Using atom names is inherently not scalable due to memory concerns when dealing with large number of alerts.

@maennchen
Copy link
Member

@Ziinc Thanks for your PR. This topic has come up before and we decided not to implement this.

  • Named Jobs (atom) are designed for static jobs
  • For everything else, you get a ref for the name. It is the users job to track those dynamic jobs.

Adding this now, would be a breaking change since it is handled by the Storage Behaviours. For those reasons, I'm closing this PR.

@maennchen maennchen closed this Jul 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants