@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ using ast_matchers::selectFirst;
4242
4343using dataflow::DataflowAnalysisContext;
4444using dataflow::Environment;
45- using dataflow::LatticeJoinEffect ;
45+ using dataflow::LatticeEffect ;
4646using dataflow::RecordStorageLocation;
4747using dataflow::Value;
4848using dataflow::WatchedLiteralsSolver;
@@ -270,11 +270,11 @@ TEST_F(CachedConstAccessorsLatticeTest, JoinSameNoop) {
270270
271271 LatticeT EmptyLattice;
272272 LatticeT EmptyLattice2;
273- EXPECT_EQ (EmptyLattice.join (EmptyLattice2), LatticeJoinEffect ::Unchanged);
273+ EXPECT_EQ (EmptyLattice.join (EmptyLattice2), LatticeEffect ::Unchanged);
274274
275275 LatticeT Lattice1;
276276 Lattice1.getOrCreateConstMethodReturnValue (Loc, CE, Env);
277- EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (Lattice1), LatticeJoinEffect ::Unchanged);
277+ EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (Lattice1), LatticeEffect ::Unchanged);
278278}
279279
280280TEST_F (CachedConstAccessorsLatticeTest, ProducesNewValueAfterJoinDistinct) {
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ TEST_F(CachedConstAccessorsLatticeTest, ProducesNewValueAfterJoinDistinct) {
289289
290290 LatticeT EmptyLattice;
291291
292- EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (EmptyLattice), LatticeJoinEffect ::Changed);
292+ EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (EmptyLattice), LatticeEffect ::Changed);
293293 Value *ValAfterJoin =
294294 Lattice1.getOrCreateConstMethodReturnValue (Loc, CE, Env);
295295
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ TEST_F(CachedConstAccessorsLatticeTest, ProducesNewValueAfterJoinDistinct) {
299299 LatticeT Lattice3;
300300 Value *Val3 = Lattice3.getOrCreateConstMethodReturnValue (Loc, CE, Env);
301301
302- EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (Lattice3), LatticeJoinEffect ::Changed);
302+ EXPECT_EQ (Lattice1.join (Lattice3), LatticeEffect ::Changed);
303303 Value *ValAfterJoin2 =
304304 Lattice1.getOrCreateConstMethodReturnValue (Loc, CE, Env);
305305
0 commit comments