Add support for Arrow Timestamp and Date32 in DataFrame

[vthemelis]

Fixes: #7260
Fixes: #7261

Timestamp contains UTC information so it makes sense to capture it in DateTimeOffset rather than DateTime.

Also, capture Date32 as a DateOnly if we're in .NET 6 (DateOnly is missing from .NET standard at this point).

---

We are excited to review your PR.

So we can do the best job, please check:

• There's a descriptive title that will make sense to other developers some time from now.
• There's associated issues. All PR's should have issue(s) associated - unless a trivial self-evident change such as fixing a typo. You can use the format Fixes #nnnn in your description to cause GitHub to automatically close the issue(s) when your PR is merged.
• Your change description explains what the change does, why you chose your approach, and anything else that reviewers should know.
• You have included any necessary tests in the same PR.

[vthemelis]

@dotnet-policy-service agree

[vthemelis]

FYI @asmirnov82

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.85%. Comparing base (1e91427) to head (13ce456).
Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...eDataFrameColumns/DateTimeOffsetDataFrameColumn.cs	9.09%	10 Missing ⚠️
...icrosoft.Data.Analysis/PrimitiveDataFrameColumn.cs	75.00%	2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs	90.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #7262 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 68.78% 68.85% +0.06%  ========================================== Files 1463 1474 +11 Lines 272288 274195 +1907 Branches 28177 28423 +246 ========================================== + Hits 187300 188791 +1491  - Misses 77748 78084 +336  - Partials 7240 7320 +80 

Flag	Coverage Δ
Debug	68.85% <66.66%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
production	63.30% <55.88%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
test	89.18% <92.85%> (+0.13%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/Microsoft.Data.Analysis/DataFrame.Arrow.cs	98.60% <100.00%> (+6.99%)	⬆️
...imitiveDataFrameColumns/DateTimeDataFrameColumn.cs	90.90% <ø> (ø)
...est/Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/ArrayComparer.cs	64.40% <ø> (+0.84%)	⬆️
...osoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/ArrowIntegrationTests.cs	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...Microsoft.Data.Analysis.Tests/DataFrame.IOTests.cs	99.14% <90.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
...icrosoft.Data.Analysis/PrimitiveDataFrameColumn.cs	72.81% <75.00%> (+0.27%)	⬆️
...eDataFrameColumns/DateTimeOffsetDataFrameColumn.cs	9.09% <9.09%> (ø)

... and 57 files with indirect coverage changes

[vthemelis]

I think I'm happy with the coverage report. The lines that matter are covered.

[michaelgsharp]

Just some minor changes but otherwise looks good to me.

[vthemelis]

Just some minor changes but otherwise looks good to me.

Thank you very much for the quick review @michaelgsharp ! I've added a few replies to your comments to help figure out the best course of action before proceeding with this.

[vtgruk]

Hi @michaelgsharp, would you mind having another look at this?

[vthemelis]

Hi @michaelgsharp , would you be able to have a look at this?

[vthemelis]

@michaelgsharp could you have another look? I addressed all of your comments so should be straightforward to review.