Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 16, 2025

📄 100% (1.00x) speedup for _get_code_start in src/black/handle_ipynb_magics.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.63 milliseconds 816 microseconds (best of 304 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces the regex-based line iteration with Python's built-in splitlines() method, resulting in a 99% speedup.

Key Changes:

  • Replaced re.finditer(".+", src) with src.splitlines() to iterate over lines
  • Removed regex dependency for line extraction while maintaining identical functionality

Why This Is Faster:

  • re.finditer(".+", src) creates a regex pattern that matches every non-empty substring in the entire string, generating match objects for each occurrence - this is computationally expensive
  • splitlines() is a highly optimized built-in method that directly splits text into lines without regex overhead
  • The profiler shows the regex approach spent 37.9% of time just in the finditer call, plus additional overhead in match.group(0)
  • splitlines() eliminates regex compilation, pattern matching, and match object creation

Performance Characteristics:

  • Small inputs (basic cases): Consistent 2-3x speedup across all test scenarios
  • Large inputs with many comments: Excellent performance gains (92-140% faster) when code appears late in the file
  • Large inputs with many empty lines: Some regression (64-73% slower) due to splitlines() processing all lines upfront vs regex's lazy evaluation, but this is rare in real-world code
  • Mixed large inputs: Generally 60-100% faster, showing the optimization handles typical code patterns well

The optimization is particularly effective for the common case of finding code after comments and maintains identical behavior while being much more readable.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 62 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 2 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import re # imports import pytest # used for our unit tests from black.handle_ipynb_magics import _get_code_start # unit tests # --------------- BASIC TEST CASES --------------- def test_basic_single_line_code(): # Basic: Single line of code, no comments or spaces codeflash_output = _get_code_start("print('hello')") # 3.56μs -> 1.13μs (216% faster) def test_basic_leading_spaces(): # Basic: Code line with leading spaces codeflash_output = _get_code_start(" x = 1") # 3.46μs -> 1.15μs (202% faster) def test_basic_leading_tabs(): # Basic: Code line with leading tabs codeflash_output = _get_code_start("\t\tz = 2") # 3.46μs -> 1.07μs (223% faster) def test_basic_comment_then_code(): # Basic: Comment first, code second src = "# this is a comment\nx = 42" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.27μs -> 1.41μs (202% faster) def test_basic_empty_lines_before_code(): # Basic: Empty lines before code src = "\n\n\nx = 99" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.55μs -> 1.45μs (146% faster) def test_basic_comment_and_spaces_before_code(): # Basic: Comments and spaces before code src = " # comment\n\n # another comment\n y = 5" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.98μs -> 1.96μs (154% faster) def test_basic_multiple_lines_code(): # Basic: Multiple code lines, should return first code line src = " # comment\nx = 1\ny = 2" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.17μs -> 1.50μs (178% faster) def test_basic_code_with_inline_comment(): # Basic: Code line with inline comment src = "x = 1 # assign 1" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.38μs -> 1.02μs (230% faster) # --------------- EDGE TEST CASES --------------- def test_edge_only_comments(): # Edge: Only comments, no code src = "# comment\n # another\n#" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.62μs -> 1.63μs (183% faster) def test_edge_only_empty_lines(): # Edge: Only empty lines src = "\n\n\n" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 2.79μs -> 998ns (179% faster) def test_edge_empty_string(): # Edge: Empty string codeflash_output = _get_code_start("") # 2.45μs -> 537ns (356% faster) def test_edge_code_is_hash_symbol(): # Edge: Code line starts with hash but is not a comment (e.g., string) src = "x = '# not a comment'" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.59μs -> 1.07μs (234% faster) def test_edge_code_after_many_comments_and_spaces(): # Edge: Many comments and blank lines before code src = "\n# comment\n # another\n\n\n z = 7" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.91μs -> 2.21μs (123% faster) def test_edge_code_with_leading_and_trailing_spaces(): # Edge: Leading and trailing spaces on code line src = " y = 3 " codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.33μs -> 1.10μs (204% faster) def test_edge_code_is_only_spaces(): # Edge: Line with only spaces, should not be considered code src = " \n \n" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.90μs -> 1.15μs (239% faster) def test_edge_code_is_only_tabs(): # Edge: Line with only tabs, should not be considered code src = "\t\t\n\t\n" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.02μs -> 1.04μs (286% faster) def test_edge_code_is_comment_with_leading_spaces(): # Edge: Comment line with leading spaces src = " # just a comment" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.55μs -> 1.17μs (202% faster) def test_edge_unicode_and_non_ascii(): # Edge: Code line with unicode/non-ascii characters src = "# comment\nπ = 3.14" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 5.33μs -> 1.93μs (176% faster) def test_edge_code_with_only_hash_in_string(): # Edge: Hash inside string, not a comment src = "msg = 'hello #world'" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.45μs -> 1.11μs (210% faster) def test_edge_code_with_multiline_string(): # Edge: Multiline string, code starts after src = "# comment\n'''\nmultiline\nstring\n'''\nx = 10" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.14μs -> 1.67μs (149% faster) def test_edge_code_is_multiline_comment(): # Edge: Multiline comment, no code src = "'''\nmultiline comment\n'''" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.26μs -> 1.21μs (170% faster) def test_edge_code_is_number(): # Edge: Code line is just a number src = "42" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.26μs -> 995ns (227% faster) def test_edge_code_is_symbol(): # Edge: Code line is just a symbol src = "@" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.28μs -> 983ns (234% faster) # --------------- LARGE SCALE TEST CASES --------------- def test_large_many_comments_then_code(): # Large: 500 comment lines, then code src = "\n".join(["# comment"] * 500 + ["x = 123"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 104μs -> 54.3μs (92.0% faster) def test_large_many_empty_lines_then_code(): # Large: 500 empty lines, then code src = "\n" * 500 + "y = 456" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 7.02μs -> 20.0μs (64.8% slower) def test_large_code_at_end(): # Large: 999 comment lines, code at the end src = "\n".join(["#"] * 999 + ["z = 789"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 176μs -> 76.1μs (132% faster) def test_large_code_at_start(): # Large: Code at start, followed by 999 comments src = "a = 1\n" + "\n".join(["#"] * 999) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.43μs -> 7.97μs (57.0% slower) def test_large_all_comments(): # Large: 1000 comment lines, no code src = "\n".join(["#"] * 1000) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 181μs -> 75.5μs (140% faster) def test_large_all_empty_lines(): # Large: 1000 empty lines, no code src = "\n" * 1000 codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 9.53μs -> 36.5μs (73.9% slower) def test_large_mix_comments_and_empty_lines_then_code(): # Large: 500 comments, 499 empty lines, then code src = "\n".join(["#"] * 500 + [""] * 499 + ["result = 42"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 94.5μs -> 57.5μs (64.3% faster) def test_large_code_with_leading_spaces_after_comments(): # Large: 500 comments, code with leading spaces src = "\n".join(["#"] * 500 + [" final = True"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 90.9μs -> 39.1μs (132% faster) def test_large_code_with_varied_indentation(): # Large: 500 comments, code with tabs and spaces src = "\n".join(["#"] * 500 + ["\t value = 'test'"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 92.1μs -> 39.2μs (135% faster) def test_large_code_with_inline_comment(): # Large: 500 comments, code with inline comment src = "\n".join(["#"] * 500 + ["x = 1 # inline"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 90.5μs -> 39.0μs (132% faster) # codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code. #------------------------------------------------ import re # imports import pytest # used for our unit tests from black.handle_ipynb_magics import _get_code_start # unit tests # 1. Basic Test Cases def test_basic_single_line_code(): # Single line of code, no comments codeflash_output = _get_code_start("print('Hello')") # 4.04μs -> 1.22μs (232% faster) def test_basic_leading_whitespace(): # Code line with leading whitespace codeflash_output = _get_code_start(" x = 42") # 3.63μs -> 1.23μs (195% faster) def test_basic_with_leading_comment(): # Comment line before code src = "# this is a comment\nx = 1" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.29μs -> 1.40μs (206% faster) def test_basic_multiple_comments_before_code(): # Multiple comment lines before code src = "# comment 1\n# comment 2\n y = 5" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.64μs -> 1.67μs (178% faster) def test_basic_code_after_blank_lines(): # Blank lines before code src = "\n\nz = 3" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.49μs -> 1.46μs (140% faster) def test_basic_code_with_inline_comment(): # Code line with inline comment src = "a = 7 # set a" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.24μs -> 1.05μs (207% faster) def test_basic_code_with_leading_tab(): # Leading tab before code src = "\treturn True" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.16μs -> 1.11μs (185% faster) def test_basic_code_with_mixed_whitespace(): # Mixed spaces and tabs before code src = " \t value = 99" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.39μs -> 1.13μs (199% faster) # 2. Edge Test Cases def test_edge_empty_string(): # Empty string input codeflash_output = _get_code_start("") # 2.41μs -> 560ns (331% faster) def test_edge_only_blank_lines(): # Only blank lines src = "\n\n \n" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.80μs -> 1.36μs (179% faster) def test_edge_only_comments(): # Only comment lines src = "# comment\n # another\n\t# indented" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.76μs -> 1.80μs (165% faster) def test_edge_comments_and_blank_lines(): # Comments and blank lines only src = "\n# comment\n \n# another" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.53μs -> 1.63μs (177% faster) def test_edge_code_is_comment_like_but_not_comment(): # Line starts with '#' but not at the start (should NOT be treated as comment) src = " x = '#notacomment'" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.39μs -> 1.16μs (191% faster) def test_edge_code_with_hash_in_middle(): # Hash in the middle of code line src = "foo = bar # assign bar" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.31μs -> 1.03μs (223% faster) def test_edge_code_with_leading_spaces_and_hash(): # Leading spaces, then hash (should be treated as comment) src = " # comment\n # another\n code = 1" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.51μs -> 1.78μs (153% faster) def test_edge_code_with_unicode_whitespace(): # Unicode whitespace before code src = "\u2003\u2002x = 5" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.02μs -> 1.47μs (174% faster) def test_edge_code_with_only_whitespace_lines(): # Only whitespace lines before code src = " \n\t\nx = 123" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.36μs -> 1.48μs (195% faster) def test_edge_code_with_comment_after_blank_lines(): # Blank lines, then comment, then code src = "\n\n# comment\n y = 2" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.06μs -> 1.78μs (128% faster) def test_edge_code_with_comment_and_code_on_same_line(): # Code and comment on same line (should return the whole line) src = "x = 1 # this is x" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 3.27μs -> 1.09μs (200% faster) def test_edge_code_with_only_comments_and_code_is_hash(): # Only comments, code is just a hash (should be treated as comment) src = "# comment\n# another\n #" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.64μs -> 1.69μs (175% faster) def test_edge_code_with_empty_lines_and_tabs(): # Tabs and spaces only before code src = "\t \n \n\tz = 4" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 4.31μs -> 1.57μs (174% faster) # 3. Large Scale Test Cases def test_large_many_comments_then_code(): # 500 comment lines, then code src = "\n".join(["# comment"] * 500 + ["x = 42"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 111μs -> 55.0μs (103% faster) def test_large_many_blank_lines_then_code(): # 500 blank lines, then code src = "\n" * 500 + "result = True" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 7.04μs -> 19.6μs (64.2% slower) def test_large_mixed_comments_and_blanks_then_code(): # 250 comments, 250 blank lines, then code src = "\n".join(["# comment"] * 250 + [""] * 250 + ["foo = 'bar'"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 56.0μs -> 33.4μs (67.5% faster) def test_large_code_far_down(): # Code is at line 999 src = "\n".join(["# comment"] * 998 + [" x = 1"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 198μs -> 98.6μs (102% faster) def test_large_all_comments_and_blanks(): # 1000 lines, all comments or blank (should return empty string) src = "\n".join(["# comment"] * 500 + [""] * 500) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 103μs -> 61.8μs (67.4% faster) def test_large_code_with_long_line(): # Very long code line after comments long_line = "x = " + "1" * 900 src = "# comment\n" * 10 + long_line codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 6.81μs -> 2.91μs (134% faster) def test_large_code_with_various_whitespace(): # Large input with various whitespace before code src = "\n".join([" "] * 400 + ["\t"] * 400 + [" y = 123"]) codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 113μs -> 34.8μs (226% faster) def test_large_code_with_unicode_whitespace(): # Large input with unicode whitespace before code src = ("\u2003" * 800) + "z = 7" codeflash_output = _get_code_start(src) # 7.10μs -> 4.40μs (61.3% faster) # codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code. #------------------------------------------------ from black.handle_ipynb_magics import _get_code_start def test__get_code_start(): _get_code_start('#\n\x00') def test__get_code_start_2(): _get_code_start('')
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
codeflash_concolic_71cur3lx/tmpux2gkkem/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__get_code_start 3.91μs 1.34μs 191%✅
codeflash_concolic_71cur3lx/tmpux2gkkem/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__get_code_start_2 2.48μs 590ns 321%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-_get_code_start-mgsouhzs and push.

Codeflash

The optimization replaces the regex-based line iteration with Python's built-in `splitlines()` method, resulting in a **99% speedup**. **Key Changes:** - **Replaced `re.finditer(".+", src)`** with `src.splitlines()` to iterate over lines - **Removed regex dependency** for line extraction while maintaining identical functionality **Why This Is Faster:** - `re.finditer(".+", src)` creates a regex pattern that matches every non-empty substring in the entire string, generating match objects for each occurrence - this is computationally expensive - `splitlines()` is a highly optimized built-in method that directly splits text into lines without regex overhead - The profiler shows the regex approach spent 37.9% of time just in the `finditer` call, plus additional overhead in `match.group(0)` - `splitlines()` eliminates regex compilation, pattern matching, and match object creation **Performance Characteristics:** - **Small inputs (basic cases):** Consistent 2-3x speedup across all test scenarios - **Large inputs with many comments:** Excellent performance gains (92-140% faster) when code appears late in the file - **Large inputs with many empty lines:** Some regression (64-73% slower) due to `splitlines()` processing all lines upfront vs regex's lazy evaluation, but this is rare in real-world code - **Mixed large inputs:** Generally 60-100% faster, showing the optimization handles typical code patterns well The optimization is particularly effective for the common case of finding code after comments and maintains identical behavior while being much more readable.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 16, 2025 00:35
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Oct 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

1 participant