You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your interesting project! I would like to ask you, if you considered using abstract syntax trees and graph DBs for the Codebase Crawler. After reading a generated tutorial on your own codebase, I got the impression, that you (simplified) "summarize" the code files and build the tutorial based on that. Other solutions are tending towards more complex solutions, like ASTs + graph DBs. For example sourcebot or CodeConcise. Did you consider such ideas, or maybe played around with that? Or was there no time for that yet, or is it maybe just "simplicity is key"?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Thank you for your interesting project!
I would like to ask you, if you considered using abstract syntax trees and graph DBs for the Codebase Crawler.
After reading a generated tutorial on your own codebase, I got the impression, that you (simplified) "summarize" the code files and build the tutorial based on that.
Other solutions are tending towards more complex solutions, like ASTs + graph DBs. For example sourcebot or CodeConcise.
Did you consider such ideas, or maybe played around with that? Or was there no time for that yet, or is it maybe just "simplicity is key"?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions