Added missing <classes> tag

utPLSQL#1107 The missing <classes> tags cause several CICD tools fail when displaying test coverage

Author: OsBlaineOra

source/reporters/ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter.tpb

@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ create or replace type body ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter is
  c_packages_footer constant varchar2(30) := '</packages>';
  c_package_footer constant varchar2(30) := '</package>';
  c_class_footer constant varchar2(30) := '</class>';
+ c_classes_footer constant varchar2(30) := '</classes>';
  c_lines_footer constant varchar2(30) := '</lines>';
  l_epoch varchar2(50) := (sysdate - to_date('01-01-1970 00:00:00', 'dd-mm-yyyy hh24:mi:ss')) * 24 * 60 * 60;
  begin
@@ -116,6 +117,11 @@ create or replace type body ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter is
  l_result,
  '<package name="'||dbms_xmlgen.convert(l_obj_name)||'" line-rate="0.0" branch-rate="0.0" complexity="0.0">'
  );
+
+ ut_utils.append_to_list(
+ l_result,
+ '<classes>'
+ );
 
  ut_utils.append_to_list(
  l_result,
@@ -129,6 +135,7 @@ create or replace type body ut_coverage_cobertura_reporter is
 
  ut_utils.append_to_list(l_result, c_lines_footer);
  ut_utils.append_to_list(l_result, c_class_footer);
+ ut_utils.append_to_list(l_result, c_classes_footer);
  ut_utils.append_to_list(l_result, c_package_footer);
 
  l_unit := a_coverage_data.objects.next(l_unit);