chore: update jest to v29

[snitin315]

This PR contains a:

• bugfix
• new feature
• code refactor
• test update
• documentation update
• typo fix
• metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

Deps upgrade. Update jest to v29

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 97.34% // Head: 97.34% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (61ad21d) compared to base (e7e3f56).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1390 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.34% 97.34% ======================================= Files 9 9 Lines 377 377 Branches 112 112 ======================================= Hits 367 367 Misses 9 9 Partials 1 1 

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[alexander-akait]

@snitin315 Need rebase 👍

[snitin315]

@alexander-akait Done. Any other breaking change we want to do for this package? Migrate to ESM?

[alexander-akait]

@snitin315 Do we resolve all TODO? If yes, I will do release 👍

[snitin315]

@alexander-akait only one TODO is left, but I see it is for webpack and not this package.

webpack-dev-middleware/src/index.js

Lines 206 to 210 in e7e3f56

	// TODO: improve that in future
	// For example - `writeToDisk` can throw an error and right now it is ends watching.
	// We can improve that and keep watching active, but it is require API on webpack side.
	// Let's implement that in webpack@5 because it is rare case.
	context.logger.error(error);

[alexander-akait]

@snitin315 it requires some changes on webpack side, so let's postpone it, also noone ask about this improve in our bug tackers so it is not priority