Skip Single-Score, Standardized Tests—Hire from Real Work
CoderPad features production-style projects to deliver a better candidate experience and saves engineering teams 20+ hours per hire.
Why Teams are Moving from CodeSignal to CoderPad
CodeSignal’s single-score, standardized tests don’t mirror day-to-day engineering tasks. CoderPad’s production-style projects keeps candidates engaged—boosting completion, reducing interview loads, and accelerating hiring.
1
Highly Customizable Assessments
CodeSignal’s assessments are rigid and inflexible, limiting what you’ll learn from candidates. CoderPad gives you flexibility to tailor assessments precisely to your job requirements.
- Fully customizable multi-file coding projects, questions, and environments
- A unified Screen → Interview workflow to streamline the evaluation
2
Instant Results, No Waiting
CodeSignal users report 3-4-day delays. CoderPad keeps your hiring process moving, with decision-ready outcomes
- In-session and same-day summaries—auto-graded outcomes, concise reviewer briefs, and code playback
- No proctoring queues or vendor turnaround
3
Exceptional Candidate Experience
CodeSignal provides an unrealistic IDE, creating a steep learning curve for candidates. CoderPad’s user-friendly and familiar interface significantly boosts candidate satisfaction.
- Engaging, intuitive IDE based on the industry-standard tool VS Code
- Higher completion rates and a better candidate experience
4
Pricing That Aligns Incentives
CodeSignal’s enterprise pricing model is a common point of friction. CoderPad offers transparent, scalable pricing with unlimited user licenses.
- Unlimited users and clear usage-based pricing
- No hidden fees, rigid seat licenses, or expensive add-ons
5
Reliable, Advanced Cheat Detection
CoderPad’s built-in technology eliminates the need for CodeSignal’s disruptive live proctors.
- Advanced plagiarism detection, code playback, and browser monitoring
- Standardized logs, session replays, and reviewer notes that satisfy hiring audits
6
AI-Aware Integrity
Evaluate how engineers actually use AI in their day-to-day tasks.
- End-to-end AI visibility across Screen → Interview—prompts, verification, and rationale captured in one workspace
- Responsible-use guardrails and fair evaluation—configurable AI policies and candidate disclosures
See Why Leading Companies Choose CoderPad over CodeSignal
| Feature | CodeSignal | |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment Style | Real-world, practical coding projects, from Screen → Interview | Standardized, vendor-administered tests, with limited support for some roles |
| Candidate Experience | Smooth, stable experience (11:1 preference) | Unrealistic IDE, low candidate satisfaction |
| Platform Reliability | 99.9% reliable, intuitive IDE | Frequent technical glitches and UI bugs |
| Pricing Flexibility | Scalable, usage-based pricing | Rigid per-user licenses |
| Customer Support | Dedicated, proactive CSMs | Reactive, offshore support |
| Customization | Highly flexible, easily tailored environments | Rigid platform, limited customization |
| AI & Cheat Resistance | Adaptive, comprehensive cheat-resistant design | Easily gamed, basic anti-cheating measures, limited AI features |
They’ve stopped supporting key roles we need and the proctoring turnaround is slow. We needed something more flexible and reliable.
Why CodeSignal Customers Switch to CoderPad
Teams have moved away from CodeSignal due to its inflexible tests, poor candidate experiences, and rigid pricing model.
CoderPad addresses these frustrations
-
Complete control over assessments tailored to job-relevant tasks
-
Superior candidate experiences with intuitive, user-friendly IDE
-
Transparent, scalable pricing model suitable for teams of all sizes
FAQs
-
Engaging, realistic coding environments that candidates prefer. A survey of 19,000 candidates revealed a (20:1 preference over CodeSignal, with higher completion rates, positive employer branding, and reduced candidate drop-off.
-
Yes. CoderPad’s open-ended coding challenges naturally mitigate AI-generated cheating, allowing you to evaluate genuine skills and how candidates effectively leverage AI tools in realistic scenarios, including advanced coding assessments.
-
Yes—with two paths. If you own the content, we’ll help you bring it into CoderPad and tune it for your roles and stacks. If the content is vendor-owned, we’ll recreate equivalent, role-aligned versions with your team—same skills, structure, and difficulty—without copying third-party IP.
-
Yes—in two ways. CoderPad integrates with major ATS platforms, like Greenhouse, Lever, Workday—and scheduling tools like Calendly and GoodTime—so jobs, candidates, and interviews stay in sync. Additionally, we have a robust API and integrations that power leading brands, like LinkedIn Learning’s code product.
-
CoderPad supports extensive tech stacks—over 99 languages and frameworks for live coding interviews and 65+ for automated screening assessments, including Python, Java, JavaScript, SQL, React, Flask, Node.js, and more.
-
CoderPad maintains high enterprise-grade security standards, including GDPR, CCPA, and SOC 2 compliance, regular security audits, data encryption, strict role-based access controls, and rigorous privacy protections.
-
Yes. CoderPad’s usage-based pricing model provides scalable, flexible options for businesses of any size—from agile startups to large enterprises.
Request a demo
Still Tied to CodeSignal’s Limitations? Take Back Control.
Single-score, standardized, proctor-heavy assessments are stalling your hiring process and damaging your brand. CoderPad provides a flexible, realistic alternative designed specifically for talent acquisition leaders and engineering teams.