[rubygems/rubygems] Excluding local platform from lockfile should not affect musl vs gnu case
This case is for not locking things like arm-darwin-23 when the lockfile already includes arm-darwin, so that we don't infinitely keep redundant versioned platforms in the lockfile when not necessary.
We detect this with Gem::Platform#===. For example, Gem::Platform.new("arm-darwin-23") === Gem::Platform.new("arm-darwin") but they're not ==.
However, in the case of -musl vs -gnu, those act as the platform "version", but === is not commutative for them. This is explained in === docs.
We only want to exclude the local platform in situations when Gem::Platform#=== is actually commutative.
Added by mdalessio (Mike Dalessio) over 1 year ago
[rubygems/rubygems] Excluding local platform from lockfile should not affect musl vs gnu case
This case is for not locking things like
arm-darwin-23when thelockfile already includes
arm-darwin, so that we don't infinitely keepredundant versioned platforms in the lockfile when not necessary.
We detect this with
Gem::Platform#===. For example,Gem::Platform.new("arm-darwin-23") === Gem::Platform.new("arm-darwin")but they're not
==.However, in the case of
-muslvs-gnu, those act as the platform"version", but
===is not commutative for them. This is explained in===docs.We only want to exclude the local platform in situations when
Gem::Platform#===is actually commutative.https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/8099c4face