Message 360540 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	terry.reedy
Recipients	cheryl.sabella, miss-islington, terry.reedy, tim.peters
Date	2020-01-23.04:30:00
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1579753800.62.0.0141210730815.issue32989@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
Tim, idlelib.pyparse has this definition: # Find what looks like the start of a popular statement. _synchre = re.compile(r""" ^ [ \t]* (?: while \| else \| def \| return \| assert \| break \| class \| continue \| elif \| try \| except \| raise \| import \| yield ) \b """, re.VERBOSE \| re.MULTILINE).search You are credited with adding 'yield' to David Sherer's original list: "Taught IDLE's autoident parser that "yield" is a keyword that begins a stmt." --tim_one (found via git blame) Do you know if there is any reason to not add 'if', 'for', and now 'with'?

Tim, idlelib.pyparse has this definition: # Find what looks like the start of a popular statement. _synchre = re.compile(r""" ^ [ \t]* (?: while | else | def | return | assert | break | class | continue | elif | try | except | raise | import | yield ) \b """, re.VERBOSE | re.MULTILINE).search You are credited with adding 'yield' to David Sherer's original list: "Taught IDLE's autoident parser that "yield" is a keyword that begins a stmt." --tim_one (found via git blame) Do you know if there is any reason to not add 'if', 'for', and now 'with'?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2020-01-23 04:30:00	terry.reedy	set	recipients: + terry.reedy, tim.peters, cheryl.sabella, miss-islington
2020-01-23 04:30:00	terry.reedy	set	messageid: <1579753800.62.0.0141210730815.issue32989@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2020-01-23 04:30:00	terry.reedy	link	issue32989 messages
2020-01-23 04:30:00	terry.reedy	create