Message340760
> It's not obvious why it should. I'd say that it's not obvious why it shouldn't. The "weakproxy" type currently supports every single "PyNumberMethods" slot *except* matrix multiplication: see https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/bf94cc7b496a379e1f604aa2e4080bb70ca4020e/Objects/weakrefobject.c#L610-L645 It seems likely that this was an unintentional omission when matrix multiplication was added. I can't think of any good reason to support all but one (well, two, including the in-place method) of those PyNumberMethods. Supporting all of them gives a (conceptually) smaller, simpler object. I think this is a consistency bug that should be fixed. | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2019-04-24 07:36:28 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients: + mark.dickinson, fdrake, SilentGhost, bup | | 2019-04-24 07:36:28 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1556091388.33.0.659080656801.issue36669@roundup.psfhosted.org> | | 2019-04-24 07:36:28 | mark.dickinson | link | issue36669 messages | | 2019-04-24 07:36:28 | mark.dickinson | create | | |