Message 304325 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	arigo
Recipients	Mark.Shannon, arigo, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, njs, vstinner, xdegaye, xgdomingo, yselivanov
Date	2017-10-13.08:16:49
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1507882610.01.0.213398074469.issue30744@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Thanks Nick for the clarification. Yes, that's what I meant: supporting such code in simple JITs is a nightmare. Perhaps more importantly, I am sure that if Python starts supporting random mutation of locals outside tracing hooks, then it would open the door to various hacks that are best not done at all, from a code quality point of view.

Thanks Nick for the clarification. Yes, that's what I meant: supporting such code in simple JITs is a nightmare. Perhaps more importantly, I am sure that if Python starts supporting random mutation of locals outside tracing hooks, then it would open the door to various hacks that are best not done at all, from a code quality point of view.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-10-13 08:16:50	arigo	set	recipients: + arigo, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, belopolsky, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, xdegaye, Mark.Shannon, yselivanov, xgdomingo
2017-10-13 08:16:50	arigo	set	messageid: <1507882610.01.0.213398074469.issue30744@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-10-13 08:16:50	arigo	link	issue30744 messages
2017-10-13 08:16:49	arigo	create