Message257516
So would the goal of a fix be something like dev/inode memoization to prevent traversing the same link twice? To provide an argument to prevent following symlinks at all (as in stuff like os.walk), possibly defaulting to followlinks=False? It looks like languages like Ruby never follow symlinks when performing recursive globs to avoid this issue ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/357754/can-i-traverse-symlinked-directories-in-ruby-with-a-glob ). It's probably easiest to just block recursing through symlinks (at least by default); memoizing risks unbounded memory overhead for large directory trees. | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2016-01-05 05:25:17 | josh.r | set | recipients: + josh.r, gvanrossum, pitrou | | 2016-01-05 05:25:17 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1451971517.7.0.288043575894.issue26012@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> | | 2016-01-05 05:25:17 | josh.r | link | issue26012 messages | | 2016-01-05 05:25:16 | josh.r | create | | |