This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martius
Recipients asvetlov, brandon-rhodes, christian.heimes, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, jcea, kristjan.jonsson, martius, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2015-07-10.10:41:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAOEXP8hEO-umBKzqod7xB28xMN_Ki+LWzRtgKpydMPjviEJr7w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1436449693.16.0.675414948951.issue16487@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
I'm not sure I know how to do this correctly: I lack of experience both with openssl C API and writing python modules in C. It may be more flexible, but unless the key is protected/crypted somehow, one would need a string or bytes buffer to hold the key when creating the private key object: not much secure. Don't you think that it should be addressed in a separate issue? 2015-07-09 15:48 GMT+02:00 Christian Heimes <report@bugs.python.org>: > > Christian Heimes added the comment: > > I'd rather introduce new types and have the function accept either a > string (for path to fiel) or a X509 object and a PKey object. It's more > flexible and secure. With a private key type we can properly support crypto > ENGINEs and wipe memory when the object gets deallocated. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue16487> > _______________________________________ >
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-10 10:41:22martiussetrecipients: + martius, jcea, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, asvetlov, brandon-rhodes, dstufft
2015-07-10 10:41:22martiuslinkissue16487 messages
2015-07-10 10:41:22martiuscreate