Message192842
> Since this is such an incredibly niche edge case > (the ordered comparison has to return NotImplemented > while __eq__ returns True), *and* the types are explicitly supposed to ordered, based on what is being tested > I remaining consistent with the existing behaviour > is the most important consideration. Agreed, once I consider that additional caveat. | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2013-07-10 22:43:02 | Jim.Jewett | set | recipients: + Jim.Jewett, rhettinger, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, lregebro, francescor, catalin.iacob, python-dev, javawizard, codemiller | | 2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | set | messageid: <1373496181.96.0.479344441855.issue10042@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> | | 2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | link | issue10042 messages | | 2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | create | | |