Message184260
is_private should return true for all prefixes that are intended for *private* use, hence it should include rfc1918 and rfc6598. rfc6598 stipulates 100.64.0.0/10 On 16 March 2013 06:34, pmoody <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > pmoody added the comment: > > Is the request that is_private should return true for all > reserved/non-routable addresses? The docstrings refer to specific rfcs > which don't cover most of the addresses listed in the wikipedia page. I > haven't done a lot of network programming in the last couple of years, so > what do folks think the least surprising result here would be? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue17400> > _______________________________________ > | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2013-03-15 21:25:15 | leim | set | recipients: + leim, terry.reedy, jcea, ncoghlan, christian.heimes, pmoody, santoso.wijaya | | 2013-03-15 21:25:15 | leim | link | issue17400 messages | | 2013-03-15 21:25:15 | leim | create | | |