> > - are you sure ignoring POSTed data is the right thing to do? Shouldn't we forbid it instead? > > - I think it would be nice to reference the RFC number somewhere > > - not sure why you raise IOError on a bad URL; I would say ValueError is the right exception here > > > > I did that because that's what the old URLopener code does (ignoring POSTed data and raising an > IOError). The comment is actually a 1:1 copy of the old code. Ok. I think it's better to take a fresh start here :-)