Message139489
> I believe that the comp.programming.threads post from > David Butenhof linked above explains why adding atfork() > handlers isn't going to solve this. In Python atfork() handlers will never run from signal handlers, and if I understood correctly, Charles-François described a way to "re-initialize" a Python lock safely under that assumption. | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2011-06-30 15:10:12 | nirai | set | recipients: + nirai, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, bobbyi, neologix, Giovanni.Bajo, sdaoden, avian | | 2011-06-30 15:10:11 | nirai | set | messageid: <1309446611.99.0.528307762992.issue6721@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> | | 2011-06-30 15:10:11 | nirai | link | issue6721 messages | | 2011-06-30 15:10:11 | nirai | create | | |