Incorrect changes from 4.9 to 5.1 #2162
Answered by manticore-projects
dani-petrov asked this question in Q&A
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by manticore-projects Feb 10, 2025
Replies: 2 comments
-
Greetings, to be very honest: I don't care much about DDL statements and just try to get them parsed somehow (especially when there are parser errors). So your helping hand will be very much welcome when you are interested in this particular topic. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by dani-petrov
-
Btw, I believe that regarding the unsigned int, 5.1 is more correct than the previous one. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Greetings,
to be very honest: I don't care much about DDL statements and just try to get them parsed somehow (especially when there are parser errors).
They have just too many RDBMS specific parts, far away from any standard to be useful in a RDBMS agnostic parser. And the Create/Alter Statement parts of the parser are grown over the time and not very well designed from begin.
So your helping hand will be very much welcome when you are interested in this particular topic.