领先的外贸供应链与谷歌推广服务 | OEM代工出口是否构成商标侵权？
案例背景：
Yamato公司是日本"Crocodile+鳄鱼图形"商标权人，2009-2010年委托中国大陆某服装公司生产带有该商标的男款衬衫，全部出口日本。2010年出口时被海关扣留，涉嫌侵犯香港鳄鱼恤公司的"CROCODILE"中国商标权。
Case Background:
Yamato Company owns the "Crocodile+Crocodile Logo" trademark in Japan. From 2009 to 2010, it commissioned a Chinese garment company to produce men's shirts with this trademark, all for export to Japan. In 2010, the shipment was detained by customs for allegedly infringing the "CROCODILE" Chinese trademark owned by Hong Kong Crocodile Garments.
法律分析：
根据中国《商标法》第52条，商标侵权需满足"在市场流通中导致消费者混淆"的要件。本案中：
- 产品全部出口，不在中国市场销售
- 商标在中国境内不具有识别功能
- 不构成商标法意义上的"使用"
Legal Analysis:
According to Article 52 of China's Trademark Law, trademark infringement requires "causing consumer confusion in market circulation". In this case:
- All products were exported, not sold in Chinese market
- The trademark had no identifying function in China
- Does not constitute "use" under trademark law
风险防范建议：
- 核实委托方的商标权属证明
- 要求提供商标注册证书等文件
- 咨询专业商标代理机构验证
- 签订书面合同明确约定：
- 产品全部出口不内销
- 商标使用方式
- 侵权责任归属
Risk Prevention Suggestions:
- Verify client's trademark ownership
- Request trademark registration certificates
- Consult professional trademark agencies
- Sign written contracts specifying:
- All products for export only
- Trademark usage methods
- Infringement liability allocation
外贸供应链与谷歌推广服务：
立足东莞，服务两岸企业，提供：
- 专业外贸供应链解决方案
- 高效谷歌推广服务
- 两岸法律咨询服务
- 台商投资配套服务
Foreign Trade Supply Chain & Google Promotion Services:
Based in Dongguan, serving cross-strait enterprises with:
- Professional foreign trade supply chain solutions
- Effective Google promotion services
- Cross-strait legal consulting
- Taiwanese investment support services
