Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn?What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I voted to reopen, since the question provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theoryInteresting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed). I also agree with Fedor Petrov that a teaching question should not automatically be closed for not being research level. Otherwise, why do we even have a teaching tag? Admittedly, this question is a bit soft (even for a teaching question), but not worthy of deletion in my opinion.
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I voted to reopen, since the question provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed). I also agree with Fedor Petrov that a teaching question should not automatically be closed for not being research level. Otherwise, why do we even have a teaching tag? Admittedly, this question is a bit soft (even for a teaching question), but not worthy of deletion in my opinion.
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I voted to reopen, since the question provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed). I also agree with Fedor Petrov that a teaching question should not automatically be closed for not being research level. Otherwise, why do we even have a teaching tag? Admittedly, this question is a bit soft (even for a teaching question), but not worthy of deletion in my opinion.
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I think the question is finevoted to reopen, since itthe question provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed). I also agree with Fedor Petrov that a teaching question should not automatically be closed for not being research level. Otherwise, why do we even have a teaching tag? Admittedly, this question is a bit soft (even for a teaching question), but not worthy of deletion in my opinion.
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I think the question is fine, since it provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed).
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I voted to reopen, since the question provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed). I also agree with Fedor Petrov that a teaching question should not automatically be closed for not being research level. Otherwise, why do we even have a teaching tag? Admittedly, this question is a bit soft (even for a teaching question), but not worthy of deletion in my opinion.
Should this teaching question about Graph Theory be reopened?
Should What (fun) results in graph theory should undergraduates learn? be reopened? In the comments, Andrej Bauer suggests that it is should be moved to Math Educators Stack Exchange, while Fedor Petrov thinks it is on-topic here. Personally, I think the question is fine, since it provides some context (location=UK, level=3rd year), and how it differs from the similar teaching question Interesting and accessible topics in graph theory (which was not closed).