GeoPackage

Views from the chairman of the GeoPackage Standards Working Group

Thursday, August 8, 2024

OGC RBT Follow-up 2

›
Last week, I wrote about the Releasable Basemap Tiles Sprint and how tiles were used as an enabling technology to efficiently deliver featur...
Thursday, August 1, 2024

OGC RBT Sprint Follow-up 1

›
OGC has recently completed the Releasable Basemap Tiles Sprint . From my perspective as the GeoPackage Standards Working Group Chair, the go...
Sunday, June 11, 2023

GeoPackage 1.4

›
We are working on a minor revision to the GeoPackage Encoding Standard. We propose three substantive changes to the standard. Making DATETI...
Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Introducing Application Profiles

›
Bottom Line Up Fron t: we want GeoPackage to be interoperable, but w e are not there yet.  It is not easy to achieve interoperability in an ...
Tuesday, June 4, 2019

It's Time We Had A Little Talk...About Metadata

›
I know this is going to make people uncomfortable, but it is time to talk about this. People want to put metadata in GeoPackage. It is just...
Monday, May 6, 2019

Views and GeoPackage

›
From the beginning, the intent of GeoPackage was to allow views to be used (instead of tables) wherever appropriate. In general, "appro...
Wednesday, February 20, 2019

The Vector Tiles Pilot

›
Last year, I posted regarding vector tiles . I am pleased to announce that I have much more to report on this front. For the last six months...
›
Home
View web version

About Me

Slar
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.