Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(101)

Issue 4570042: Fix for putImageData

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
14 years, 5 months ago by gmanchromium
Modified:
14 years, 5 months ago
Reviewers:
junov, bsalomon, reed1
CC:
skia-review_googlegroups.com
Base URL:
http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gpu/
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Fix for putImageData TEST=manually ran tests that were failing BUG=84165 TBR=reed@google.com

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -0 lines) Patch
M src/GrContext.cpp View 1 chunk +1 line, -0 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 6
kbr1
Committed as http://code.google.com/p/skia/source/detail?r=1518 .
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 01:27:38 UTC) #1
gmanchromium
Hey Mike, Justin and I found this issue. Can you take a look and make ...
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 02:22:00 UTC) #2
reed1
Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too.
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 11:41:01 UTC) #3
bsalomon
On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote: > Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too. ...
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 12:39:18 UTC) #4
bsalomon
On 2011/06/07 12:39:18, bsalomon wrote: > On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote: > > Seems right. ...
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 12:43:08 UTC) #5
junov
14 years, 5 months ago (2011-06-07 14:41:31 UTC) #6
I agree. I just didn't feel comfortable doing that for the branch. Also, I want to make changes to dumpRenderTree to force it to re-init (possibly destroy and re-create) GrContext/GrDrawTarget between tests. The reason that layout tests were not failing was because previous tests were performing some state intitialization that was persisting into the following tests. Gregg picked-up on this when he realized that a test failed in isolation despite passing when executed in a larger batch. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:43 AM, <bsalomon@google.com> wrote: > On 2011/06/07 12:39:18, bsalomon wrote: > >> On 2011/06/07 11:41:01, reed1 wrote: >> > Seems right. I'll make sure brian sees it too. >> > > LGTM >> > > LGTM, too. > > When the modified code was originally written there was no color filter. > We really should have a "reset to default" type call so that we don't > have to remember to modify this code (and possibly others) every time we > add state. I'll file a skia issue against myself for this. > > > http://codereview.appspot.com/**4570042/<http://codereview.appspot.com/4570042/> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "skia-review" group. > To post to this group, send email to skia-review@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to skia-review+unsubscribe@** > googlegroups.com <skia-review%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/skia-review?hl=en <http://groups.google.com/group/skia-review?hl=en> > . > > 
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld f62528b