Message142477
> D'oh. I just realized why the -M option wasn't being recognized - I had passed it > after the actual test name, so it was being treated as another test instead of an > option. Sorry for the confusion :/ > > As for the actual test results, test_huge_bytes_(32|64)b both pass, but > test_huge_str fails with this traceback: Can you replace "_2G" with "_4G" in the decorator for that test? | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2011-08-19 16:58:59 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, alexandre.vassalotti, nadeem.vawda, santoso.wijaya, nyevik, jorgsk | | 2011-08-19 16:58:58 | pitrou | link | issue11564 messages | | 2011-08-19 16:58:58 | pitrou | create | | |