Message103833
Or perhaps the bytearray can be converted to a bytes object. This is not optimal performance-wise but is unlikely to make a difference in real-world code (if you are passing a filename to an external API, chances are some IO will occur which will dwarf the cost of creating a separate bytes object). But I agree that supporting bytearrays in filename-taking functions, while "nice" from a consistency point of view, isn't really useful in practice. So I would be ok to remove that support if it simplifies (or avoids complexifying) the logic for those functions. | |
| Date | User | Action | Args | | 2010-04-21 12:28:57 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, vstinner | | 2010-04-21 12:28:57 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1271852937.17.0.825806652857.issue8485@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> | | 2010-04-21 12:28:55 | pitrou | link | issue8485 messages | | 2010-04-21 12:28:55 | pitrou | create | | |