After working with existing RL frameworks, we noticed three persistent problems that motivated RL2's development:
1. The Heavyweight Framework Problem
Most production RL systems (like ByteDance's veRL) require:
- Complex infrastructure dependencies
- Significant engineering overhead
- Deep integration with proprietary systems
2. The Reasoning Gap in AI Agents
Current tools (Auto-GPT, AgentGPT, etc.) demonstrate:
- No memory between tasks
- Static decision policies
- Zero learning capability
3. The Prototyping Bottleneck
Researchers and indie developers need:
- Quick iteration cycles
- Minimal setup requirements
- Clear debugging paths
How RL2 Addresses These
Our solution provides:
✅ True modularity (swap components without breaking core)
✅ Distributed training via torchrun (no Ray dependency)
✅ Sub-1000 LOC core for easy understanding
Example Use Case
In our B2B procurement agents, RL2 enables:
- Adaptive negotiation strategies
- Context-aware decision making
- Continuous performance improvement
Let's Discuss
For those working with RL/AI agents:
- What's been your biggest framework frustration?
- How important is simplicity vs features in your work?
- Would a minimalist approach like this help your projects?
Full technical details in our blog post - we'd appreciate any feedback from the dev community.
Top comments (0)